MISREPRESENTATION

The economy is essentially a concept in a constant state of flux … or,

TREAT OF THINGS AS THEY ‘ARE’

TO UNDERSTAND ‘TRUE ECONOMY’ AND WHERE  ASSETS, CAPITAL AND ANY FORM OF ‘TRUE MONEY’  ORIGINATES FROM – AND TO ALSO DETERMINE WHO IS THE TRUE CREDITOR

Consider this –

What is an economy?

A thing exists.

An idea is an impression of a thing that exists, made upon the mind.

An idea is an impression upon the mind of a thing that exists.

Correctly speaking, an idea is the impression made upon the mind of a thing that exists.

An idea, being the impression made upon the mind of a thing that exists, indicates or points to the thing that exists.

An idea indicates or points to the thing that exists.

The facts, therefore, we are to consider and account for are those things that exist.

The facts we are to consider and account for are those things that exist as we naturally find them, and not make of them what we will or try to change them.

The facts we are to consider are those things that exist and that also undergo their own changes.

A man exists.

A man has freewill provided to him by nature.

A man’s freewill is tempered by the necessity to not harm or injure anyone in order to exercise that freewill.

A man performs productive services.

A man’s productive services are brought into being in accordance with his ability and whims.

Men exercise their freewill when they engage in exchanging productive services with each other in accordance with their whims or freewill.

It is a man’s prerogative, rightly accorded to him by nature, as to whether or not he engages in the exchange of productive services.

Man, outside of necessity, rightly ‘chooses’ the extent or degree to which he employs himself in productive services and as to whether he will engage in the exchange of his production and to what extent. Idiomatically put – we don’t live to work, we work to live.

Man’s activities, that bring into existence his productive services or things, will undergo changes according to necessity and as he sees fit.

Therefore, man exists and his activities exist and rightly undergo natural change or are in natural flux in accordance with his whims or freewill.

What then is, the concept of economy that is in a constant state of flux?

The concept of economy is the idea impressed upon the mind, that indicates or points to – man’s existence and the existence of his natural activities in the provision of productive services and their exchange, and that these rightly undergo natural change or are in natural flux in accordance with man’s whims or freewill.

The facts we are to consider and account for are those things that exist as we naturally find them.

Having observed man’s natural state with respect to the provision of productive services and the exchange thereof, any prescription we provide to facilitate man in his endeavours ought not to disagree with ‘the facts we are to consider and account for as those things that exist as we naturally find them’, and above all with regards to man, that accord most importantly to freewill; without which, man would be but a slave.

The concept of economy then, when prescribed, is not to unduly distort man’s natural and ‘just’ inclinations but to indicate and therefore reflect, without undue interference, man’s activities with consideration to only his productive services and their exchange as he naturally sees fit to make of them as he will – and nothing more.

From the foregoing, we can see man ‘rightly’ makes to others his own representations of his own production on his own behalf and without interference, in accordance with his freewill. Each man engages in his own personal affairs with another on, of course, the basis that he harm or injure nobody in so doing, in order that he rightly and correctly expresses his freewill according to his own dictates and no other – for all men are equally born to nature with freewill. Forcibly subjecting another’s freewill to your ambitions would be the height of hypocrisy and folly and must be recognised as such.

Our prescription to indicate true economy as we find it must reflect, ‘justly’, man’s natural right to make his own representations according to his whims or freewill.

When those representations of a man’s work in the form of productive services or things are unable to be provided immediately in exchange for the productive services or things of another party, then it may be agreed between them that a promise of delivery at a later date will suffice in order to effect an immediate exchange.

There is an obligation to perform therefore owing. This ‘debt’ or obligation is the performance of work to be done towards the provision of the ‘actual representations’ in the form of productive services or things, for the benefit of the other party as creditor.

There is an indebtedness or debt owing, as, an obligation to perform.

Debt therefore is not just conceptual, as though created from thin-air. It truly exits in a promissory obligation to perform for the party who is owed that performance. And that can only be for the ‘true’ creditor who gave up some-thing  or property in exchange for an obligation to perform. The obligation to perform being the debt. There is equal consideration given by both parties as ‘value’, otherwise known as ‘valuable consideration’.

Once the obligation to perform has been fulfilled in part or in whole then there is no longer a debt of a promise or obligation to perform, in part or in whole. That promise to perform or that obligation to perform is naturally extinguished. There is no longer a need to continue with an obligation to perform that has been performed, in part or in whole. It has been completed or ‘fulfilled’.

It can be said of this promissory obligation ‘to perform’, that it ‘must’ be naturally retired on its completion or ‘fulfilment’, in part or in whole. Only that that remains to be performed need be performed, all else having been ‘justly’ and naturally retired on performance.

Those ‘actual representations’ then, in the form of productive services or things, that have been fulfilled through performance need not and should not be made available any longer – as completion or fulfilment of performance, namely the obligation to perform as promised, in part or in whole has been achieved and honoured. Only that that remains to be performed need be performed, all else having been ‘justly’ and naturally retired on performance.

Therefore, ‘retirement’ from providing representations is the natural and just action to be taken – the principle being the same, without exception, were it to extend to all other situations where an obligation to perform had been ‘fulfilled’ and honoured.

A CLOSER EXAMINATION

It will be readily seen that performance is required to be able to provide for ‘actual representations’ in the form of productive services or things, in line with the truth that ‘something cannot emanate from nothing’.

This will be understood to mean that for their validity, representations in the form of  ‘something’, cannot emanate from the ‘nothing’ of non-performance – this, of course, is in accordance with the self-evident truth that ‘something cannot emanate from nothing’. Such a state of affairs would be the prerogative of God and not of man whose very being and actions are bound to nature and all that ‘exists’ in nature, and that are accorded their operations by nature’s God or natures observable laws.

Therefore, were it to be the case that the party as debtor owing the promise to perform provided, in-advance of performance, the ‘actual representations’ in the form of productive services or things to the full satisfaction of the creditor for the obligation owed, then to demonstrate the validity and probity of the exchange, performance would still be required from the debtor in order that the true position of the debtor’s exchange accorded to the truth – that representations provided in the form of ‘something’, in-advance of performance, could not emanate from the ‘nothing’ of non-performance, for there to be agreement with the ‘actuality’ of that which ‘exists’ as a genuine position in nature.

(It must always be remembered that there are two parts to an obligation to ensure its ‘complete’ fulfilment – the first part being the contributing performance towards producing ‘actual representations’ in the form of productive services or things, and the second part being the productive services or things themselves, which are as a consequence of performance produced and delivered).

So, were it to be the case that a debtor delivered representations as productive services, in-advance of the actual ‘performance of having to do the work still owing’ for those representations,

and,

that any ‘subsequent representations’, in the form of productive services or things, that were produced as a consequence of the debtor having to fulfil ‘the performance of having to do the work still owing’ for the representations delivered in-advance,

and also,

to further ensure that the creditor was fully and totally satisfied that ‘the performance of work still owing’ did in fact occur,

were this to be the case, it would be found that those ‘subsequent representations’ in the form of productive services or things would be the property of no one.

Such ‘subsequent representations’ would not belong to the creditor for the reason that the creditor had been provided, in-advance, ‘actual representations’ in the form of productive services as ‘early’ satisfaction for the fulfilment of part of the debtor’s obligation. Nor in turn would these ‘subsequent representations’ belong to the debtor, for reason that the other part of the debtor’s  obligation, ‘to still perform by doing work’, would attach itself only to the representations that were provided in-advance, for which ‘performances of work still owed’ would as intended satisfy and meet those ‘representations made in-advance’ without extending the ‘performances of work still owed’ any further than the ‘representations of productive services made in-advance’.

The foregoing explanation would be reasonable with regards to the debtor’s position of having to fulfil his obligations. The debtor’s position of having to perform work on the one hand to be able to obtain and deliver productive services or things for exchange on the other hand, would conform to the facts as they are – that in the physical world, ‘matter or energy can not be added to or taken away’, but merely transferred so that it remains constant throughout nature or throughout the universe.

With this in mind, the debtor’s position of having to perform work, would be in conformity with the self-evident truth – that, for all things made up of matter or energy to remain constant throughout nature, ‘something cannot emanate from nothing’. If this were not the case, the universe or nature, as it is found ‘to be’, could not ‘exist’.

Therefore, the matter or energy that went into the representations delivered in-advance of work having been done to bring them into existence, would need to come from somewhere. And that can only be from the energy the debtor gave up, by performing work to be able to provide them. If the debtor had not already done so, then he would need to give up that energy as work, otherwise the productive services or things delivered in-advance could not validly exist. This would be in line with the self-evident truth that ‘something cannot emanate from nothing’.

On a more practical note, this would be a way to ensure that the representations in the form of productive services the debtor delivered in-advance were genuinely owned by the debtor. In any dispute as to their ownership or origins the debtor could demonstrate, through the work that the debtor was presently doing without reward, that in fact, it would be this work, that the debtor would be presently performing without reward, that is intended to meet the obligation towards the productive services that were delivered in-advance.

To be clear, it must be remembered that the creditor’s position of having received ‘actual representations’ in the form of productive services or things, is one of being provided representations in-advance without the debtor having done anything towards their provision. This being the case, the other part of the obligation, the promise to perform owed by the debtor, which is the promise to do work, would still have to be met for the creditors satisfaction and benefit, as a promise to be kept and a promise that accords with the truth, that ‘something cannot emanate from nothing’.

WHAT HAS BEEN DETERMINED

In such circumstances, where representations are provided in-advance of performance, those ‘subsequent representations’ produced as a consequence of having an obligation to still perform, would be the property of no one, neither the creditor whom had already received representations early or in-advance, nor the party owing ‘the obligation to perform’ and therefore obliged to perform as the debtor – because as a debtor, that debtor provided the representations in-advance and ‘without performance’, and is therefore duty-bound and obliged to perform ‘without reward’. If this were not the case, the debtor would otherwise be effectively receiving property for free from the creditor, to whom he owes a performance. Property was provided to the debtor in exchange for the debtor’s full performance. Without the debtor doing work as payment towards the representations he delivered in-advance, it would mean that the debtor would obtain ‘something for nothing’ from the creditor, who gave up property in exchange for an obligation to perform or an obligation to do work. This would not agree with the ‘natural’ situation as it would be found in existence or as it would ‘exist’ in nature. It would amount to a perversion and would therefore be an injustice.

THE SAME PRINCIPLES APPLY REGARDLESS OF THE FORM REPRESENTATIONS TAKE

Therefore, it can be seen from the actions of the parties involved in an exchange, that if performance by the debtor had not yet been made towards representations which, regardless of the ‘form’ they took, were provided in-advance, those ‘subsequent representations’ produced as a consequence of having an obligation to still perform, would have to be retired from ‘circulation’ or use, since they would not belong to anyone. That is to say, since they would not belong to anyone, such representations would have to be simply withdrawn or ‘retired’, meaning, destroyed. The ‘retirement’ or destruction of these ‘subsequent representations’, regardless of their ‘form’, would be the ‘natural and just’ action to take.

When we again consider, those representations of a man’s work in the form of productive services or things that are unable to be provided immediately in exchange for the productive services or things of another party, and it is agreed between them that a promise of delivery at a later date will suffice in order to effect an immediate exchange, then we can see, deduce and accept that the promise to perform would therefore be a sufficient an obligation to consider it as being ‘just as good as’ taking the place of the actual representations in the form of productive services or things, that a commitment had been made towards for later delivery or collection.

Now, it is these promissory obligations to perform, that allow for ‘alternative’ representations; as evidence of having done the work towards providing the ‘actual representations’ in the form of productive services or things as promised for exchange – with the mere formality of their collection or delivery having to take place.

Again, it can be these same promissory obligations to perform that allow for ‘alternative’ representations as evidence of work which will be done, towards productive services or things as promised for exchange, that are and can be considered ‘just as good as’ the actual things themselves in which they are put in the place of, and of which the collection or delivery of the ‘actual representations’, that is the things or property, would be a mere formality at an agreed later date.

Money are ‘alternative’ representations as evidence of performance, or work done, as promised.

Money are also ‘alternative’ representations as evidence of performance, or work that will be done, as promised.

Money, therefore, are not the ‘actual’ representations in the form of productive services or things themselves, but can be used in place of them as ‘alternative’ representations, evidencing or proving the work done or the work that will be done in the fulfilment of promises to perform towards contributing to ‘the pool of wealth’ from which exchanges can be made for the benefit of the ‘true’ creditor.

Those same ‘alternative’ representations, that is money, as proofs of the fulfilment of a performance to provide ‘actual representations’, in the form of productive services or things, are then for the benefit of the ‘true’ creditor who gave up some-thing in exchange and are not for anyone else – especially are they not for a printer-publisher who merely prints or publishes on request such evidences, and most certainly does not give up any-thing or any property in exchange as equal value or valuable consideration that shows his own efforts as proof of his working or having worked towards providing the actual thing or the actual property that had been exchanged for ‘a promise to perform’ in the first place.

The concept of economy ‘must’ be the idea impressed upon the mind that indicates and reflects ‘the truth’ of what exists in nature and therefore in ‘fact’. It must indicate the truth of what ‘is’ and not of what we would like it to be or ‘is not’. Take of things as they ‘are’, for a prescription of economy to indicate ‘the true economy of man’, and not as you want them to be – mere wishful thinking as mere ‘assertions’ of what evidently does not fall under our ‘observations’. Such a state of affairs would be an unacceptable distortion and would contrive to contort our very acts to its ‘unnatural’ dictates of fiction.

If we are to find that an economy is distorted then we are obliged to ask, for whose benefit would that be for?

To Conclude –

What is left to be said to a people therefore, is, ‘you must not fail to grasp the absolutely ‘natural’ necessity of having to provide and present your own representations, without interference, together with the natural opportunity correctly provided to you to be able to fulfil or make good on your promises to which those representations attach and correspond. This would be the only ‘just’ means of ‘naturally’ reflecting your private affairs, without interference from a third party whom by definition ought not to be involved whatsoever in any of your personal dealings – to which, as freewill accords – you chose to engage in. By this very means, your personal affairs remain your own and are not subject to distortion.’

SOMETHING WICKED THIS WAY COMES

Who would imagine that ‘something wicked this way comes’ refers to economic growth.

It must not be forgotten that the growth that is talked about with its innumerable economic measures to demonstrate its alleged benefits, is growth that resides in a context which does not describe ‘the true economy of man’  in accordance with his natural condition and freewill, but resides in ‘a distorted description of the economy of man’.

In this context, growth can only seek to conceal the distortion imposed upon ‘the true economy of man’ and therefore distort and redirect his freewill demonstrable away from ‘self-reliance and self-sufficiency’ into one of dependency.

Growth that not only resides in distortion but is built on its foundations ought not to be called growth at all since its only object would be to mask the very distortion that stifles man’s true inclinations provided for him by nature.

By what name then is growth to be unmasked as an accomplice to distortion.

Consider for a moment that distorting ‘the true economy of man’ necessarily calls for deceptive or incomplete terms which make hidden the true nature of the imposed distortion on ‘the true economy of man’.

Now, all conjurors rely on the ability of successfully creating diversions to ply their trade,  and there is no-better-a-diversion with regards to false or ‘distorted economy’ than that of growth. It mesmerises the unsuspecting with its ‘prospects and promises’ of bounty to come. These ‘prospects and promises’, growth holds out temptingly within reach, are offers of better times ahead given in seemingly detailed measured scrutiny in a myriad of ‘if only…’ possibilities of every shape and form.

Were it to be that simple then, we would need only to look to the details of the ‘prospects and promises’ that growth had to offer charted before us, as opposed to the foundations on which growth were staged or seated upon.  Surely a classic case of not being able to ‘see the forest for the trees’.

The almost ‘being able to’ taste and touch better times to come while the conjuror has the temerity to ‘pick-pocket’ you and relieve you of your wealth for which you will show him your appreciation with rounds of applause is the ultimate diversion ‘so-called growth’ offers.

For man’s hopes to be placed in the hands of ‘distortion’ and its veil of growth, would not only be preposterous but, would with ‘certainty’ bring about a tragic end to those who have not eyes to see nor ears to hear and sadly at the same time engulf everyone else besides.

The true and full name then, by which growth is to be called in its unmasking is ‘The Growth Towards Your Destruction’.

This then, is growths task. It is growths task to entice, engage and compel you into believing that the sweet fragrant dishes of delectable prospects that lie ahead are within reach if only you hold-out  and weather-the-storm, for a good fattening-up in better days to come.

‘Everything to be had’ is just around the corner it bellows.

Alas, false prospects indeed.

Under the present systems of distortion, so-called growth that prospers man does not encourage prosperity but quite the reverse. That is to say, it becomes a mathematical certainty that all prosperity and growth towards prosperity ceases, and all economies of all countries terminate.

A clear and unequivocal graphic description of the processes that lead to the destruction of all economies can be found here:

[Note.- Begin 2:32 minutes into video No.3 (PART 01C – INTRO) and continue…]

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=4F0FC0AC39B3086A                                                                   

 

‘How deserving a gift freewill must be 

To those who no not its measure 

To wonder why it is 

They have no lasting pleasure’

Advertisements

THERE IS NO DEBT IT’S JUST YOUR IMAGININGS

WITH A LITTLE PATIENCE KNOW HOW EASY IT IS TO UNDERSTAND HOW YOU ARE BEING DECEIVED USING

SUBTLE LAWYERS TACTICS IN LANGUAGE MANIPULATION AND OMISSION TOGETHER WITH YOUR MISTAKEN

ASSUMPTIONS OF THINKING YOU KNOW WHAT IS BEING SAID

THERE IS NO DEBT IT’S JUST YOUR IMAGININGS

 

A preliminary explanation of money and economy:

The idea of banks having irresponsible lending practices as a problem for people serves as a red-herring or distraction.

A trick to draw you away from the real problem of the obfuscation and misrepresentation of your promises into falsified debts for the banks.

The banks do not fund or do work equal to the representations evidencing the fulfilment of your loan.

That is to say, they do not fund or do no work for the representations or tokens that evidence the fulfilment of your promises to fund or do work for your loaned thing or your loan. They merely falsify a debt to themselves.

 

WHAT DOES THIS ALL MEAN ? … AND HOW DO THEY FALSIFY DEBTS ?

WITH A LITTLE PATIENCE IT IS EASY TO UNDERSTAND

_______

A

CLEAR AND SIMPLE EXPLANATION

OF

HOW BANKS FALSIFY DEBT TO THEMSELVES

OR

BREAKING THE SPELL OF IDIOCY

_______

 

You fund or work for the representations or tokens evidencing (or proving)  the fulfilment of your promises to others, that is, you actually fund or do the work yourself for your loaned thing.

These promises are promises that you had made on paper for the thing you had been loaned – your loaned thing, your loan.

Therefore, you fund or work for the representations or tokens evidencing the fulfilment of your promises that you had made to others.

These promises of yours are to be found in a document otherwise referred to as a loan document or promissory note or promissory obligation. This promissory document is the document relating to the loaned thingyour loaned thing, or simply put your loan.

Your loan is the thing on loan to you, the thing you are loaned, your loaned thing or, for short, your loan.

Your loaned thing, for which you have exclusive use of as though it were yours, is the thing you do work for. You fund or work for your loaned thing until you have fulfilled your promises to complete the funding or work for your loaned thing.

Once you have fulfilled your promises to fund or work for your loaned thing, it is no longer your loaned thing but becomes your loaned thing.

The representations, tokens or pieces of paper which evidence your promise that you have worked or will work for your loaned thing are commonly called money.

You provide the funding or work to be able to make available the representations or tokens evidencing the fulfilment of your promissory note or promissory obligation – which are the promises you made on a document.

Your promissory note document or your promissory obligation document is often called your loan document or, the documentation for your loan.

This document is not your loaned thing. It is a document of promises made for your loaned thing. It is a document which is related to your loaned thing. It is your document of promises that is also called a loan document. It is your loan document and not your loaned thing.

The document of promises or your loan document is the document that shows the promises for your loaned thing. The promises are made to whomever is loaning you the thing which becomes your loaned thing.

Your loan document, which is sometimes called, and confusingly shortened to, your loan, is a promise to whomever you made that promise to. It is the promise for the thing you are loaned – your loaned thing. Your loan (document) is a promise towards your loaned thing, the thing itself. It is a promise to do work for the loaned thing. It is not a promise to do work for the representations.

The representations are simply proofs that you have fulfilled or will fulfil work. The representations simply evidence that you have done or will do work as you promised. You are not promising to do work for the representations. They are simply the evidence or proofs that you have done or will do the work as promised.

These representations as evidence or proof that show you have done or will do the work are called money.

You are not promising to do work for the representations, you are promising to do work for the thing or loaned thing.

You are not promising to do work for money. You are promising to do work for a thing or a loaned thing.

You are not working for money, you are working for a thing, like the shopping you need or your family needs, for example, food.

You will not be working for money, you will be working for a loaned thing, like a car or a house.

The representation that evidences the work you have done, as you promised, for your things or, the representation that evidences the work you will do, as you promised, for your loaned things, are simply evidence for work you have done or work you will do.

These representations are not evidence of a thing or loaned thing. These representations are evidence of work you have done or work you will do.

These representations are not evidence of a loaned thing. These representations are not evidence of the thing loaned.

They are not evidence of your loaned thing. They are not evidence of your loan(ed) thing. They are not evidence of your loan.

Representations are money.

Money are not evidence of a loaned thing. Money are not evidence of the thing loaned.

Money are not evidence of your loaned thing. Money are not evidence of your loan(ed) thing. Money are not evidence of your loan.

Money are simply representations evidencing or proving that you have worked as promised for a thing or you will work as promised for the loaned thing. The loaned thing is your loaned thing, your loan(ed) thing or your loan.

The evidence that the representation provides for you by showing that you have worked or will have to do work, belongs to you.

The representations belong to you since they are evidence of you having done work or having to do work. You are the one that does the work – no one else. Your work, your representations of evidence – no one else’s. It is as simple as that.

If you go to a printer for them to print for you representations as evidence or proof that you have done something for someone else or will do something for someone else, then the representations are not the printers but belong to you and are then to be given to that someone else – not the printer.

If you go to a bank for them to publish for you representations as evidence or proof that you have done something for someone else or will do something for someone else, then the representations are not the banks but belong to you and are then to be given to that someone else – not the bank.

What does the printer receive from you for his services of printing your representations? A small and reasonable fee for printing or publishing them.

What does the banker receive from you for his services of printing your representations? A small and reasonable fee for printing or publishing them.

The representations that evidence or prove you have done or will do work as promised are not a loaned thing, a thing or a loan. The representations are simply evidence, as proofs, that you have done or will do work as promised. That promise to do work is given in the promissory note, promissory obligation or loan (loan document). Once the work is done or will be done the representations are proofs that you have fulfilled or will fulfil work. You obviously then have not borrowed the representations since they are not the thing on loan that you are doing the work for or will be doing the work for.

As a consequence, the representations are not a loan but simply evidence of fulfilling a promise to do work or have work done for a thing loaned or borrowed from someone else. The thing loaned is your loaned thing or your loanyour borrowing.

The thing borrowed or loaned could be a car, a house, etc. The representations are the evidence or proof of work done or work you will do for the thing loaned. The representations then should rightly go to someone who has loaned the thing to you. There is no need to do any further work for anyone else.

Now it becomes clear to see, that completing or fulfilling your promises and providing evidence for those promises in the form of representations are not the same as the things themselves loaned. The representations are definitely not the things loaned or your loan.

The representations are not a loan. The representations can also be called money. Money is a representation, that is, evidence that you have done or will do work – as promised for a loaned thing, for your loaned thing, for your loan. And therefore, money cannot be a loan.

You have not taken out a loan or borrowed a damn thing from the bankers for money to be your loan, or a borrowing.

What you have done is to ask them (the bankers) to print or publish your representations evidencing work done or to be done, and for the publishing of these representations they should receive a small fee like any other printer.

They should certainly not receive representations evidencing your work and that are equal to your work; which is the work you have done or will do for someone else as promised in the promissory note, promissory obligation or loan (loan document).

As well as not receiving representations that evidence your work or are equal to your work, they (the bankers) most definitely should not be receiving interest on your representations.

These representations do not belong to the bankers. These representations belong to you, and are to be delivered to someone else as proof or evidence that you have fulfilled your promises to do work or you will fulfil your promises to do work for your loaned thing or your loan, that you obtained from that someone else.

Put another way, they (the bankers) should certainly not receive money as representations evidencing your work since they have provided no-thing (or nothing) to you, except the service of printing or publishing your representations for which they are to receive a small and reasonable fee as would any other printer or publisher doing the same job.

Money is evidence of work done or work that will be done as promised. It is evidence of a promise fulfilled or a promise that will be fulfilled. The work is the value ‘you provide’ as ‘the only value of work to be considered’. The work is your ‘valuable consideration’. The bank, who should be correctly called a printer-publisher or just a publisher, provide no valuable consideration. The bank provide no valuable consideration simply because they are not party to the loan agreement document or promissory note. That is why you provide the work and they do not. You are party to your loan agreement document attached to your loaned thing and that is for your loaned thing, or relates to your loaned thing. That is why you do the work. You, of course, must work for your loaned thing, not the bankers.  That is why they can never directly sign the loan agreement document as though they were party to it. The bank can sign the loan agreement document , if they dare to sign it at all, only as a witness to the document. They would be merely witnessing your signature. A witness is not a party to an agreement. If the bank signs that agreement as a party to it, they would be committing fraud because they have not provided any valuable consideration for that loan document agreement. They would be playing the role of an impostor or false debtor in order to misrepresent for themselves and for their benefit, what YOU PROVIDE AND OWN AS YOUR NATURAL ENTITLEMENT as the true debtor. That entitlement is to be able to evidence the work you have done or the work you will do, by providing representations for that work. Those representations evidence, as proofs, your promises. Those representations are created and provided by you as a consequence of promises you made for a loaned thing given to you by someone-else, who is in fact your true creditor – NOT the banker.

Those representations, as evidence or proofs, are created by you and not the bank. The bank are mere publishers executing your orders to print your representations as evidence or proofs, which belong to you, and are for the benefit of someone else for promises you made that have been or will be fulfilled. These evidences or proofs, commonly called money, are NOT the bank-publishers and are NOT for the benefit of the bank-publisher. They are not the bank-publishers because he is not the debtor entitled to create them as evidence or proofs in the fulfilment of promises made to someone-else, the true creditor. You are the debtor. Further, they are not the bank-publishers because he is not the one who has provided you with a loan of some-thing, to be then a creditor for something given. Nor is he truly party to your promissory note or loan document agreement with the party that gave you something; be it a house, car, etc.

For the banker, who is merely a publisher, to then MISREPRESENT your entitlement to himself, which effectively puts him in the position of PRETENDING that he ‘owns’ YOUR ENTITLEMENT THAT YOU HAVE AS A DEBTOR TO CREATE THE CREDIT you owe to someone-else, which credit represents YOUR EVIDENCE OR PROOFS OF PROMISES YOU ARE TO FULFIL for the benefit of, and to be CREDITED TO that someone-else who made a genuine loan to you, simply is incomprehensible. This pretense is – ‘the bankers lie of economy’; which becomes the basis for the bankers to perpetrate further abuses on all of us. Abuses that are excused by economists with their economic gibberish, under the mistitled banner heading of ‘Economics’, and that all add up to – ‘the lie of economy’. Evidence or proofs of promises, commonly called money, belong to you and are for the benefit of the true creditor to be credited with – and are NOT OR SHOULD THEY EVER BE for the benefit of the banker-publisher, who is just that, a publisher in the printing business.

The publishers deception and ‘misrepresentation’ in the first instance, is twofold. Firstly, to misrepresent himself as a debtor – which is a false position. Secondly, presenting himself as a creditor providing a loan to you – which is another false position.

The further instance of the publishers deception and ‘misrepresentation’ is to further multiply artificial debts he falsely says you owe, with compound interest.

(This multiplication of artificial debt does not end there. Consider all the dealings and activities the publisher encourages and engages in, because he knows your ignorance of what is truly going on ‘in your name’. Ignorance that ends with you bailing-out or bailing-in a lie designed to confiscate ‘your true wealth’.)

What you have been doing by providing the bank with money or evidence of your hard work, with interest, is that you have been stupidly making charitable donations to the bankers, on their terms for one, five, ten, fifteen, or more years when they have asked you to. They ask you to sign-over your representations to them and then they ask for payments through a statement and you just stupidly provide them with payments or evidence (representations) of your work. A ‘bank statement’ is not evidence that they have given up anything of value or given up valuable consideration. A ‘bank statement’ is just simply asking for money, that is why it does not come with an invoice or a copy of the actual book-keeping entries proving and showing that they (the bankers) provided something of value or valuable consideration. All they provide is a printing or publishing service, no-thing more.

 

As you descend from (1) – (4) obfuscation and misrepresentation of everyone’s roles increases:

(1) Your loan document is your promise made to someone to fund or work for your loaned thing.

(2) Your loan document is your promise made to someone to fund or work for your  loan(ed) thing.

(3) Your loan is your promise made to someone to fund your loan.

(4) Your promise to fund your loan.

 

As you descend from (1) – (4) obfuscation and misrepresentation of everyone’s roles increases:

(1) Your loan document is your promise to fund or work for your loaned thing, so that you will be able to request or order money, to be provided for by the banker, that will evidence the work done or you will do, as promised in your loan document, promissory note or promissory obligation drawn-up in front of your banker.

(2) Your loan document is your promise to fund or work for your loaned thing, so that you will be able to request or order money, to be provided for by the banker, that will evidence the work done or you will do, as promised in your loan document, promissory note or promissory obligation drawn-up in front of your banker.

(3) Your loan document is your promise to fund or work for your loaned thing, so that you will be able to request or order money, to be provided for by the banker, that will evidence the work done or you will do, as promised in your loan document, promissory note or promissory obligation drawn up in front of your banker.

(4) Your loan is your promise to fund your borrowed or loaned money, to be provided for by the banker, as promised in your loan document, promissory note or promissory obligation drawn up in front of your banker .  [Note. -You may further reduce this to – ‘your promise to fund your loan provided by the banker’]

 

Obfuscation and misrepresentation can happen when you do not really understand the role being played by the banker in (1):

(1) Your loan document is your promise to fund or work for your loaned thing, so that you will be able to request or order money, that will be provided by the banker, which will evidence the work done or the work you will do, as promised in your loan document, promissory note or promissory obligation drawn-up in front of your banker.

Everything becomes clearer when you truly understand the role being played by the banker in (2):

(2) Your loan document is your promise to fund or work for your loaned thing, so that you will be able to request or order money, that will be printed by the printer-publisher, which will evidence the work done or the work you will do, as promised in your loan document, promissory note or promissory obligation drawn or written up in front of your printer-publisher.

Note. – It does not matter if the banker, or correctly speaking the printer-publisher or publisher, draws up or writes up the loan document, promissory note or promissory obligation for you – It is still your document with only your signature as party to it.

 

The representations or tokens evidencing or proving the fulfilment of your promises or obligations to fund or do work, for your loaned thing which the loan document relates to, are symbolic representations or tokens commonly called money.

The representations or tokens evidencing or proving the fulfilment of your promises or obligations to fund or do work, for your loaned thing which the loan document relates to, are symbolic representations or tokens commonly called money.

Money then, is a direct representation evidencing or proving that you have fulfilled or will fulfil the promises you made to fund or work for your loaned thingyour loan.

Money is a direct representation evidencing or proving the fulfilment of your loan document (sometimes confusingly just referred to as your loan but it should be given its full title of loan document) , promissory note or promissory obligation.

Money are then proofs of the fulfilment or fulfilling, through work, of a contractual promissory obligation or loan document.

Put another way, these representations or money prove to everybody’s satisfaction, as evidence, that there are documented obligations that you have made, which are being fulfilled and supported, if you have not already done so, through the fruits of your labour. That is, through the work you have done or will do – up-to and until your obligations are fulfilled or completed for your loaned thing, your loan.

 

Conclusion –

By now it must be clear to you that your loan is not money which you have had published by a printer-publisher masquerading as a banker. By now you must have clearly understood that the banker is not owed anything, not one penny – except a small but reasonable fee for printing or publishing your evidence as money. This money is representational evidence which goes to someone else for promises you made in your loan document for your loan or loaned thing.

By now it must be also clear to you that gold, silver, etc., are of themselves just pieces of metal with no intrinsic value whatsoever. Precious metals are no more precious than lumps of iron.

What truly is of value are your promises to do work or to have work done. You can present and show those promises on a piece of paper, a piece of wood, the soles of your shoes or even a piece of metal. It really doesn’t matter. What is of importance is not the medium the promises are carried on, or made on, but that you  worked or you promised to do work. Keeping your promise is of importance. Keeping your formal or contractual promises to ‘the correct party (people)’ is of importance. That is all that matters.

Furthermore, once the work is done or your promise is given that the work will be done, the representations evidencing the work that is done or the work that will be done can be presented and shown on paper, wood, the soles of your shoes, or even pieces of metal called gold for example. The medium themselves (paper, wood, the soles of your shoes, or pieces of metal), evidencing the work done or the work that will be done, are only of value in that they demonstrate and show that the work has been done or will be done. The medium will then conform and equate to the work and no further than the work agreed, for the use of the thing or loaned thing. The medium, tokens or representations have no value in and of themselves except when they demonstrate and carry the evidence that work has been done as promised or work will be done as promised. It is the work that is of value not the representations or tokens. The representations can only have meaning if they are supported through work.

It really does not matter on which medium those promises are made on. It really does not matter on which medium those representations that evidence that work has been done or will be done, are also made on. What is of value are your promises to do work or have work done. What is of value is that you do the work. That work is provided for the benefit of  the true creditor and not the false creditor. It is provided for the benefit of whomever loaned you your thing. Representations evidencing the work done or the work that will be done are for the benefit of whomever loaned you the loaned thing. By now you should be able to know who is the true creditor and who is the false creditor. By now you should be able to know what ‘falsified debt’ or ‘debt falsification’ means. By now you should know that the ‘emperor’ has no clothes. By now you should be able to know what is of real value. What truly is of real value is YOU.

 

Beware Of Wolves Clothed As Sheep –

Anyone who says bankers create money from nothing or writes that money is created by banks from thin-air, or any such nonsense, like gold or silver has intrinsic value, clearly does not understand how this mechanism of obfuscation and misrepresentation works. Either that or, they are in league with the banks. Think about it.

All governments of whatever political persuasion are in the same business as the bankers, in having our promises obfuscated and misrepresented into falsified debt for the benefit of the bankers, and therefore you are entitled to ask, are they working in-collusion with the bankers? All governments of whatever political persuasion expect us to pay for these falsified debts as ‘loans made to the nation’ – the ‘nations debts’ – including the interest, through taxation and numerous other money collection schemes. For some reason, all governments from whichever end of the political spectrum have never been able to discover this ‘obfuscation and misrepresentation of  promises into falsified debt for the bankers’, although they have been provided with details and analysis of the problem and the only possible solution that could truly remedy this falsification of economy and deliver a ‘just’ economy that works, together with the exact mathematical proofs for all of this – many, many years ago – which they still all refuse to implement.  Also, what has been clearly demonstrated is that together with this obfuscation and misrepresentation of promises into falsified debts for the bankers, interest aggravates and ensures the inevitable failure and termination of all economies under this system of falsification. We should then wonder why governments of all political persuasions have failed to act? That being the case, why don’t you act amongst yourselves without waiting for permission from government. It is your choice. It is your ‘freewill’ to do so. Think about it.

ARE YOU AWAKE YET.

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=4F0FC0AC39B3086A

_______

UPDATE:

WAKE UP YOU’RE BEING TAKEN FOR A FOOL – DECONSTRUCTING TERMS
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/10/28/wake-up-youre-being-taken-for-a-fool-deconstructing-terms/