What man can do, he can also undo by simply giving himself permission.



Note. – In order that the bankers lie of economy does not continue to devastate our lives, great attention must be paid to what this presentation shows and describes




What follows is the only authentic way to be rid of your mortgage. By this is meant – paid in full, without having to work towards an artificial debt.

In paying-off a mortgage or a loan (artificial debt) in the way to be soon described, we ensure that the bankers lie of economy is exposed for what it is – a lie. That the artificial debts in question are shown to be worth the true value of what they amount to.

We also ensure that we ‘mind our own business’ with regards to the way others operate ‘their business’. What happens administratively within a bankers business operations, or what financial instruments mean and the terms describing them mean, or what happens to paper-work, is quite frankly, none of our business.

None of us need to hopelessly struggle in trying to learn and understand the mechanisms of banking, because we simply do not work for the bankers lie of economy, and hopefully, nor would we ever aspire to be bankers.

To be rid of our artificial debts, all we need do, is to accept defeat.

What matters, is to accept defeat for – all of the ‘objects or elements’ to be found in a contract.

We need only pretend that an artificial debt is owed, without putting up a fight against the bankers unjust requirements of the artificial debt having to be paid.

To just accept defeat by admitting to owe a banker his artificial debt is our strategy.

In this way all artificial debts – mortgages and loans from bankers and their finance houses – can be authentically paid in full with the stroke of a pen.

This strategy to ensure the payment of an artificial debt in full and the documentation that it requires for its success is, however, a band-aid. Simply because, without knowing and understanding the how’s of the ‘distortion’ imposed on everyone’s economic life, the bankers together with their proxies, would just continue withdrawing  the money supply from circulation through taxation, bail-outs, bail-ins etc., for the payment of an artificial debt, as is happening now.

No money supply, no economy. And in such a situation, finding the money to pay for an artificial tax bill, or whatever the excuse used to effectively create ‘a bill’ to withdraw the money supply in circulation for the benefit of bankers in order to confiscate real property and leave us destitute, would place everyone in effective foreclosure, that is to say, confiscation of real property towards artificial debt payments that are unable to be paid.

And that is just on the basis of not wanting to complicate issues, by leaving aside entirely, thoughts on jurisdiction as a separate concern.

Nevertheless, the truth describing the only way for ‘everyone’, whatever their circumstances, to genuinely provide evidence that an artificial debt has been paid in full for the value owed, would stand up to scrutiny if called for in any ‘genuine’ court, and furthermore, it would stand up to scrutiny as one that does not require any attempt to try and understand the lie and nonsense of banking operations. The strategy of defeat on its own merits, without relying on understanding the perverse operations of banking that amount to a lie, would evidently be the only method that relied on presenting the truth as it stands – that there is no debt.


The actual item in an exchange ‘is’ the valuable consideration that a contract speaks of and that forms the basis of the contracts or agreements existence (without which the contract or agreement could not be reached and therefore the contract or agreement would not exist)

Valuable consideration exchanged equals the actual item to be exchanged. The actual item to be exchanged equals valuable consideration exchanged.
(Valuable consideration exchanged = the actual item to be exchanged)

The actual item, which ‘is’ the value of worth wanted, and to be considered in an exchange, and that forms the basis of an exchange, ‘is’ the valuable consideration of worth in a ‘contract’ or agreement of exchange. Valuable consideration ‘is’ the actual item itself and what its worth is agreed to be


Conceptual Definitions Of A General Nature To Assist Discovery Of The Facts As They Are And Not As We Wish Them To Be  –

An Item / Items –

Productive services (property, goods and services) that are wanted and are of use, and are the things of ‘value to be considered’ (valuable consideration) in an exchange, for which purpose the exchange is made, and without which an exchange could not happen nor would there be any point in trying to enter into an exchange to begin with.

That is to say, supporting documentation as evidence, that

i)   speak of an exchange of items, and

ii)  show that an exchange of items had taken place, and finally

iii) provide for evidence that is representative as proofs, of the fulfilling or fulfillment of promises made in support of an exchange of items – items that ‘had been or would be made available’ for the pool of wealth from where exchanges would take place,

would need to show, present or indicate, where those actual items, as the ‘values to be considered’ for exchange, and given to the pool of wealth from which exchanges would be made, are to be be found, in order to validate the authenticity of the exchange

Value –

Those items that are wanted and useful, and whose worth are given, in turn, as the items that can be exchanged for them, as signifying their agreed value. Their agreed value on exchange, can be shown and evidenced on paper – that is to say monetised

Agreement / contract –

A ‘meeting of the minds’ on the items to be exchanged and their value, together with full-disclosure to ensure fairness

Valuable consideration –

An item or those items wanted and ‘considered as the value of worth’ in an exchange

Medium –

is that which is used to show , present, communicate, store or record ‘a message’ as evidence or proof. It is that by which or on which a representation of something else is stored (recorded). The medium is not the item of valuable consideration that forms the basis of an exchange. It is the object or place by which or on which the worth of the item as valuable consideration is recorded as evidence to it. For this purpose of recording evidence, any object or place may be used, although it is customary or the convention to use ‘paper and ink’.

Gold –

A medium that can be used as another form of object or place by which or with which evidence can be represented or re-represented when it is held by a publisher.

Unless you were doing business principally with a metal-dealer, and not a publisher, then ‘your evidence’ published by a publisher would go to meet obligations owed to a metal dealer or merchant, for his metals in exchange – which would be the valuable consideration you are exchanging ‘your evidences’ for. The publisher in printing or publishing ‘your evidence’ would receive for his services a reasonable fee, not the entirety of ‘your evidences’ plus interest (See Medium)

Evidence –

are the proofs to show that an event has taken place or will take place. The event can be a ‘promise’ made, to do something or have something done

A Medium of Exchange –

is that by which, on which or with which a message is communicated or stored (recorded), as evidence of the actual items (valuable consideration) made available or to be made available for the pool of wealth from which exchanges can be taken. A medium of exchange evidences the fulfillment of the promises made for the delivery of productive items, or for their future delivery – the items being the valuable consideration as productive services. A medium of exchange is the medium on which or with which the representational evidence of that which is exchanged is shown or symbolised by. It is the medium on which evidence is shown or the medium by which evidence is symbolised – a medium carrying evidence of something else (valuable consideration), or a ‘medium of evidence for exchange’ representing or evidencing something else (the actual items as valuable consideration are what are being evidenced in an exchange)

A store of value –

is that medium which stores (records) the value of ‘something else’ – an item or items of productive service – as the contribution given towards the pool of wealth made available for exchange. It merely records the value or worth, it is not the item of value itself.

A store of value is then, the medium that records the worth of ‘something else’

Delivery note –

shows the items to be delivered, or provided for acceptance as delivered (on verification)

An Invoice –

testifies to actual items having been delivered and accepted by calling for their payment, in the form of actual items themselves, that have been or will have been contributed to the pool of wealth from which exchanges can be made for items of valuable consideration,

or in other words,

calls for payment in the form of ‘evidence’, as representations that are supported by the actual items of valuable consideration promised to be made available for the pool of wealth from which exchanges can take place in due course

Book-keeping –

summarises and records the particulars to an event or exchange, which particulars or information are derived from the supporting documentation of an invoice or which particulars or information provide for the issuance of an invoice.  Book-keeping records or shows the item or items exchanged, the monetised ‘considered value of worth’ of the item or items, and other relevant information to an exchange agreed upon.



It will become apparent that the bankers ‘lie of economy’ produces artificial debts whose sole purpose can only be ascribed to confiscation, and it will also be made absolutely clear that – ‘there is no debt’.

However, even if we were to accept invalid contracts, based on the lie of economy, through which these artificial debts had been entered into, there would be no need for apprehension in meeting their payment in full.

In other words income, as a reward earned from producing productive services or items, need not be ‘lost’ in making payments, in full, for these artificial debts.


It must be fully understood that regardless of the merits of puting into motion, operations that would provide evidence of payment being legitimately made and honoured in full, for an invalid contract, without having to concede a single penny from your hard earned wealth to do so, it would not be expedient for the courts to recognise the merits of such an action – or at least, we could reasonably speculate that their hands, through no fault of their own, would be tied to not rule in our favour. It could be said of the courts that they are there, not to be ‘seen’ to do justice, but are there, to ‘seem’ to do justice. Why this should be so, will be understood in light of what follows.


The judiciary resides and operates in a private chartered corporate country created by private political charter, that is to say a private constitution, in which the courts, as of course private corporations, form a part. The banks operate in the same private chartered corporate country as either conventional private corporations in the jurisdiction of that private corporate country, or as state chartered banks which are also private corporations in the private chartered corporate state or country.

Nonetheless, they are all private corporations subject to the wishes of the owner or owners, whom may remain hidden, of the private corporate countries jurisdiction, and ‘within’ which these corporations operate.

The purpose of these private courts and their judiciary then, is not to defeat the ‘object’, as a constitution, which created and established them, as they have no right to do so in that that right is not within their contractual terms and conditions of obligation which clearly would not permit them to exceed their authority, but to fulfil, the wishes of their corporate owner or owners. For they have a job to do, within the remit of the criteria established by the private constitution which they are contractually required to fulfil, and to fulfil in the execution of their duties on those whom are subject or contracted to that corporate states jurisdiction out of their own choosing.

Nevertheless, on presentation of a case in a court which could hear cases from disparate jurisdictions without its interference, made as ‘opinions of the court’; and in whose presence it were never conceded to belonging to the private countries jurisdiction of which those in the employ of the court would form a part; then and only then, could such a case be won, not necessarily won in terms of the motion you would bring ordering the court, to pronounce your decision to have the court fulfil your wishes of having the alleged debt dismissed in your favour – although this is to be expected – but in terms of exposing the duplicitous nature of their operations in not providing full-disclosure of their interests as a ‘conflict of interests’.


It must always be remembered that the business performed with a banker-publisher or publisher, is to do business with him for the printing of ‘your evidences’ that are representative of the promises ‘to be fulfilled’ or fulfilled for others. The publishers stock-in-trade are ink and paper and the service he provides in printing or publishing ‘your evidence’, and nothing more. What is wanted from the publisher, is the printing of your evidence and the service of printing he provides for that to be done.

What is not wanted from the publisher is a house, a car, bars of metal, a cup of tea, or anything else, which would have been obtained by directly doing business with the merchants or sellers providing those very things as valuable consideration.

The publishers valuable consideration is the service he provides of printing or publishing your evidence, and the costs of doing so would not entail, for example, working towards paying for the cost of a house.

The house as valuable consideration in an exchange would be obtained from a seller of that house, and your valuable consideration of the productive services you produce would be what is exchanged for that house.

The valuable consideration required from the printer on the other hand, would be merely his services of publishing ‘your evidences of working’ to produce productive services or items, in order for you to take ‘your property of now published evidences’ that the publisher was instructed by you to publish, and hand them over to the seller of the house in exchange for his house.

It would be absurd for the publisher to ask for, as payment, the price of a house together with interest for his services of publishing, since his valuable consideration is not the house.

The cost of his services as valuable consideration would clearly not amount to a great deal as we all can testify to, when we go to do business with a printer.

Having placed an order with a printer to print ‘our written property’, we would not expect an invoice demanding the cost of a house, but the reasonable cost of the valuable consideration he provided, and that is the costs of printing or publishing our ‘written property’:

How much does it cost to produce currency and coin?

Dollar Printing Uses 9.7 Tons Of Ink Per Day, And Other Fast Facts About The US Dollar

How Much Does It Cost to Print a Dollar Bill?

How Much Does It Cost to Print Money?


Unless we are ‘staring down the barrel of a gun’, we all contract freely and on our own terms. Having to sign or fulfil a contract ‘at gunpoint’ or out of fear is called robbery, and should never be tolerated by any reasonable people as a whole, since all such contracts are rightly considered and taken to be ‘null and void’ – without force and effect of law.

Defeatism as it is meant here, is a surrender that achieves its aims, by accepting an antagonists claims and then calling into question, not through aggression but through acceptance, those very claims.

Accept defeat and surrender to the claims that you seemingly have an obligation to fulfil. An obligation that you agreed to enter into and that must follow, in strict accordance, the requirements of the law.

When we examine natural behaviour anywhere in the world with regards to people making arrangements with each other, freely and without intimidation when doing business, then contract law establishes, by noting, what people have always done throughout the ages in agreeing to exchanges regardless of where and when in the ages of man.

Now, it is clear that agreements to exchange anything or any item or items, are a contract. And that, like valuable consideration for like valuable consideration in value or worth, must be met by both parties to that exchange.

What is the valuable consideration that the publisher, who as banker taking on ‘magic powers’ provides ?


That of a printing or publishing service.

We do not want anything else from him when we engage to do business with him, other than the publishing of ‘our evidences’. Of which evidences he will publish on material that we commonly think of as paper. We of course would prefer paper as it is more convenient in so many ways than accepting our evidence as a great big lump of heavy metal. Moreover, we want services from him as a publisher and not a metals-dealer.

Let the baby keep his toys (contractual claim that a debt is owed to him) and play by himself. It is just as well that he is ignored by surrendering to his claims or accepting his claims, because everything he ever claimed to achieve through the prowess of his operations in banking was through his lie of economy. But not only that, everything he ‘claims’ to own as property is to be found in his jurisdiction.

Wherever that jurisdiction is, is where his property is to be found and therefore his ‘claims’ to property may stand, if not challenged. He can make no claims to property to be found elsewhere.

Pray tell, where is that jurisdiction to be found ?


WHERE AM I – published March 20, 2013

In letting the baby keep his toys, that is to say, providing him with the valuable consideration that he claims he is owed, we write him a promissory note that has like value or worth of valuable consideration supporting it as the valuable consideration he provided to us. And that consideration amounts to nothing – zero.

The numbers, as figures, he writes on a piece of paper that he claims he is owed, do not have any valuable consideration to support them. He has no doubt already been paid for the valuable consideration he provided us in publishing ‘our evidence’ in his capacity as a printer-publisher.

But the further numbers he presents on paper as being owed to him, are not supported by work he has performed in producing further items of valuable consideration to justify his claim of having given us that amount of items in value or worth as valuable consideration.

Only someone who had provided us with items of valuable consideration to that extent, would be entitled to ‘redeem’ our evidences against the items we produced through our labour in support of those very same ‘evidences’ we issued to them

The magician banker on the other hand, claims he provided us ‘paper’ beyond the worth or value of the valuable consideration he provided to us as a publisher. When we accept his claim that he has provided us his evidences as a loan, then we are to ask, where is that ‘valuable consideration’ with which his claim of providing us his evidences is supported by.

For the figures on paper he presents to us as being owed to him, must be supported by something or by some item of like worth that we had required from him when doing business. Well, not to our surprise, we find that the paper he claims to have provided us has no supporting valuable consideration, it is irredeemable.

Contract law requires and demands like worth is exchanged for like worth. Irredeemable notes for irredeemable notes. We are therefore justified with providing him with an irredeemable promissory note, that presents ‘his’ numerical figures that he says are owed to him, for ‘payment in full’. Like for like.


Having understood what the issues are, we are now able to provide for letters that can be used to prove and completely fulfil any obligations we are said to have for the payment of artificial debts. The letter which enables us to do this becomes the founding document to eliminate our artificial debts in full, without having to perform productive work towards these debts.

The letter as the founding document, and its accompanying correspondence will be given in the next article titled –




THE LAW – April 28, 2013



MISREPRESENTATION – February 27, 2013


WHERE AM I – March 20, 2013


Germany refuses fresh relief for Greeks as debt ratio spirals out of control

US- South Africa War Games: The Pentagon’s Hidden Agenda is to Make “Africans fight Africans”

Note.- The bankers will have us at each others throats, one way or the other, in all aspects of our lives by doing whatever it takes . The Greeks suffering has nothing to do with the people of Germany who are psychologically ensnared and trapped in a distorted view of the world by not understanding the mechanisms of ‘true economy’ and ‘how and where relationships are formed’, just as we all are caught in these misconceptions created through distortion.

No True Justice, No Real Peace Until the Bankers Are Arrested and Out of Power

Ensuring the withdrawal of the money supply for the payment of artificial debts:

G-20 Pushes for Measures to End Tax Evasion

The global bankers mean to bury us, whether we like it or not, for their long planned global governance

The Elite’s Agenda

Kissinger: ‘Terrorists’ Just ‘People Who Reject The International System’

Comment.- Interesting to note the company name behind Kissinger is that of a bank

Note.- Withdrawal of the money supply through the Lie of Economy precipitates catastrophic collapse. Without eliminating the Lie of Economy and replacing it with True Economy, we all are at the mercy of ‘The Lie of Economy and its Agenda of Wealth Confiscation’. From there, a feudalistic world automatically ensues :

Bankers and their proxies ‘feigning’ concern doesn’t fool anyone. We all know whats behind this –
Another blow for the Government: Public sector borrowing £500m higher than 2012

10 million households feel the squeeze

More families ‘feeling the squeeze’

Poland to relax fiscal discipline to spur economic growth

Poland To Relax Budget and Fiscal Rules to Stimulate Economy

Note.- Withdrawal of the money supply precipitates catastrophic collapse. Without eliminating the Lie of Economy and replacing it with True Economy, we all are at the mercy of ‘The Lie of Economy and its Agenda of Wealth Confiscation’. From there, a feudalistic world automatically ensues :

Hungry Britain: welfare cuts leave more than 500,000 people forced to use food banks, warns Oxfam

Britain on the Breadline: Middle Class, Hungry and Homeless

Chinese Bank Loans

China risks deflation trap as true GDP crumbles

City rocked by new scandal as probe gets underway into suspected attempt to rig price of government debt

Note.- A theatrical collaboration to authenticate the notion of banking debts as genuine. A lie remains a lie regardless of trying to present it differently; A lie can’t be regulated – There is no debt.

Red-Symphony – Global Enslavement using Capitalism and Communism pdf


Fighting The Trans-Pacific Partnership

Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP): Corporate Power-Tool Of The 1%

Note. – Understanding ‘Jurisdiction’ and submitting yourself to defeat, by ‘Minding Your Own Business in letting The Baby Keep Its Toy {Corporate Fictional Country}’,  allows for ‘Defeatism’ to be used against him in defeating himself, when he ends-up with no one to play with.

Humans Not Predisposed to War, New Study Finds


Chemical Zombification –
We are turning childhood into a disease

Vaccines Can Cause Infertility

CDC ‘Disappears’ Page Linking Polio Vaccines To Cancer-Causing Viruses




The question then becomes:

How can, and when do States presume that they can form or charter ‘State Chartered Banks’ as private corporations ?


When they themselves, are Private Chartered Corporations formed or chartered by ‘private interests’ entitled in their private capacity to form or charter other private corporations through their Private Chartered States.

SF Fed admits a private corporation, pay dividends!!!


David Haynie: “I had a really quick question, the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco specifically, is that formed as a private corporation itself?”

David Lang: “Ah yes it is actually. yes our state chartered banks, banks under a charter share that, and we pay a dividend on those shares.”

(Note: What is the ‘that’, that banks under a charter share ?  Answer: They share the similarity of being private corporations and that a dividend is paid to the share-holders whom are owners of the State Bank, either directly or via their other corporate holdings, that is, Chartered States, through the mechanism of ‘private trust’ agreements)


11-16-11 Federal Reserve Of San Francisco comes to HSU (31:06 minutes)

The cruel mirth surrounding the plight of zombies for those with a wry sense of humour, is that zombies have no conception that they are without ‘spirit of freewill’ and that they are ‘dead’, all acting as a single homogeneous ‘senseless mass’, as ‘things’ having no greater purpose other than being worthy of ‘annihilation’ and ‘irreversible permanent slavery’ – a condition of slavery that would apply to those remaining zombies left ‘animated’, in what has been familiarised to us as their state of being, ‘the undead’.

We no doubt, have all been made aware of the sudden intense short lived but strange interest and appearance of images across the planet, brought to us by the entertainment industry and even the so-called serious mainstream press and media , parodying people as zombies. In light of the knowledge that these pages present, these images can only be interpreted as a source of humour for those in the ‘know or loop’. Those that truly mock all of us, as not knowing or having the conception that we are all seen by them to be as good as ‘dead’, and are seen as ‘things’ to be annihilated in the very near future, as having no greater purpose other than to take-up space, with what would be left of the remaining population, living out their lives into future generations as designated slaves – the undead’.

Those of us who think of this as an exaggerated claim, ought not to misconstrue the analogy being made.

The ‘effects’ of our current predicament, which we see as suffering in others, and which suffering will without doubt extend to all of us, has a ’cause’.

A ’cause’ that is simple to understand once identified and which in ‘cold logical terms’ can have no other purpose but to create an ‘effect’; an ‘effect’ that clearly would not exist without its ’cause’.

We ought to recognise this as being a reasonable method of inquiry, since we are all subject to cause and effect.

With that in mind,

i)    were we to acquire an understanding of the true and natural principles that as a ’cause’, underlie and direct the ‘effects’ on man’s natural behaviour – the principals as a ’cause’, that are undeniably the ‘true principles’ we are all individually subjected to when we relate to each other, and that can be easily observed in the way we naturally and ‘effectively’ behave in forming relationships;


ii)   were we to make observations of any distortions to these true and natural causal principles that would produce in turn ‘distorted effects’ on man’s behaviour, resulting in unnecessary suffering, that we all clearly see and feel;


iii)   by these means of contrast and comparison, we would all understand and see the ‘workings of distortion’ on the true and natural principles of cause and effect on our lives, and finally be able, to determine whether these ‘workings of distortion’ were of divine providence or of the traditions-of-men;

      and therefore and most importantly

iv)   have the means within our own individual power of authority and ability, to know how to present evidence, as proofs, in solving the question of – HOW TO CORRECT IMPOSED DISTORTIONS; knowing that this could be done using the time-tested methods of proved and trusted knowledge, that,

what man can do, he can also undo by simply giving himself permission

To our advantage the ‘central point of focus’, that we can take away with us and share with others when we consider how our lives are being presented as a type of zombification, is that we can merely recognise our freewill and take back our lives by choosing to ‘read’ what is presented in these pages, in order to understand the tools that are the simple underlying principles which allow us to do just that – the taking back of our lives; safe in the knowledge that the best place to entrust our future is with ourselves, without the risk of being unknowingly zombified or annihilated by those who would follow the traditions-of-men.


In the form of:

(Description) … relinquishing the freedoms of ‘innate freewill’ … (description) … for that of … (Description)

Privately Created Alternative Fictional Jurisdictional Territories within a Fictional World Map Mimicking the Real World, have been created to misdirect the unsuspecting into relinquishing the freedoms of ‘innate freewill’ that operate in the jurisdictional Territory of the real world (Land or where mans reach extends), in which and where Natural Law Common To All People reigns supreme, and under which ALL people are equal under its Jurisdictional Authority, for that of, The Privately Held Politics of A Despotic Man Made Chartered Fictional Jurisdiction with its accompanying Private Despotic Controlling Man Made Legislation, under which ALL people whom are unknowingly contracted, are equally slaves under its Expanding Private Jurisdictional Authority




April 28, 2013


April 5, 2013



February 26, 2013


February 27, 2013


April 17, 2013



March 20, 2013


 May 10, 2013


Published – April 15, 2013


Read article: DEFEATISM – OUR ZOMBIFICATION II, published July 23, 2013



We Are All Being Equally ‘Normalised’ (Impoverished) In Preparation For Feudalism –
Soviet KGB defector & Communist propaganda expert, predicts Obama’s gameplan almost 30 years ago

Who Will Rescue The Rescue Fund –
Fitch downgrades European rescue fund EFSF

No comment –
Polish economic revival not earlier than 2014 – central bank

Ageing Britain ‘faces up to five more decades of austerity’

China’s great economic leap forward hits the wall

China finance minister hints at growth below 7pc

China Govt Advisor Says Economy In Crisis As Debt Costs Spiral

Renewed fear of global recession as companies rein in spending plans

Most Americans Don’t Know that the Federal Reserve Banks Are Private Corporations

Fitch strips France of AAA rating

EU Official: Pooling Sovereignty, Once “Unthinkable,” Now “the Model”

The wheels are coming off the whole of southern Europe

News To Manipulate the USA (1975)

Homeless people being forced to live in caves

The Bank of keeping mum or being dead: The financial scandals just keep piling up for the Vatican’s money-men

Reference Material: A Global Public Authority – published March 03, 2013

S&P amazingly says no one should believe its ratings are independent and objective

Definition – Puffery

Overpopulation Is A Myth

World Bank Population Policy; Remote Control

The Population Control Holocaust

Source publication:
The Molecular Vision of Life: Caltech, The Rockefeller Foundation, and the Rise of the New Biology (Oxford University Press, 1993)

The Rockfeller Foundation’s Molecular Vision of Life — How the Aims of Eugenics, Social Control, and Human Engineering Shaped Molecular Biology and 20th Century Science –
A Review of Lily E. Kay’s The Molecular Vision of Life: Caltech, The Rockefeller Foundation, and the Rise of the New Biology (Oxford University Press, 1993)

Secret British MMR Vaccine Files Forced Open By Legal Action

Episode 017 – The Myth of Overpopulation


An interesting perspective on world events:

Yuri Bezmenov

Pressure From Above And Below

Travelling Down the Road to Serfdom: History of Socialism – Yuri N. Maltsev

Review and Commentary – Not A Shot Fired

And Not A Shot Fired (Booklet);topic=9086.0;attach=621




Anyone who has taken the time to read the archived articles,

THERE IS NO DEBT IT’S JUST YOUR IMAGININGS – published 26 February 2013


MISREPRESENTATION – published 27 February 2013,

will soon come to appreciate what is meant by The Bankers Switch and Bait given in the title heading above.

We can examine this ‘switch and bait’ stratagem at play, where we may have sincere or well-meaning advocates of this bankers ploy, whom ‘inadvertently’ support it and are convinced of its merits without realising its purpose as a ‘Trojan horse’, by asking ourselves the question – what is wrong with the ‘picture’ that the following article, as our example for inquiry,  presents as a seemingly powerful case for complementary or local community currencies:

 The Crime of Alleviating Poverty: A Local Community Currency Battles the Central Bank of Kenya


The switch is – the change of position or posture the bankers take, in their ‘pretense’ of the loss of control they would be subjected to if local currencies or complementary currencies were seen as an alternative in facilitating everyone’s economic activity. A pretense of vulnerability and weakness that provides;

the bait of – having us believe that complementary currencies really are the panacea they are being widely purported to be in ridding us of the bankers. Evidenced with what appears to be their astounding success and the real concerns bankers would have with them, exemplified by the actions of the Central Bank of Kenya.

If that were not enough, as further supporting evidence of the merits of these types of currency, we are led to believe that somehow the bankers proxies in the guise of central or local government have altruistic motives in encouraging the spread of local currencies throughout the world’s communities; to the extent that even that most philanthropic of all benefactors, the bankers United Nations, is even given a bit-part to play in this theatrical production of the absurd that amounts to a total sham.

Anything endorsed by the bankers proxies would need to be thought over very carefully, especially when it comes to currencies.

However, the ploy is soon discovered when just the word ‘bank’ is retained as a ‘lender’ of these complementary currencies.

When does a publisher get to lend to you what is yours ? Answer, when he magically becomes a banker.

For those of us who want to understand what is meant by this, the answer to this mystery is very rapidly discovered when we read the articles referenced above.

So, the question to ask then, is – when does a ‘publisher’ get to acquire the ability to suddenly ‘issue’ or lend us what has always been ours ?

Does a ‘publisher’ somehow acquire magic powers because he changes his name from publisher to banker with the wave of a magic wand ?

This magician of a publisher announcing and presenting his act as though at a fair-ground, as one of – ‘the mystery secrets of the wonders of complementary currencies brought to you from strange and exotic distant lands‘ – and calling himself banker, truly has magical abilities. As an illusionist performing the deed of misdirection to successfully draw the audiences attention away from his gambit – that of deception; as would any illusionist worthy of his trade in his ability to deceive ‘the mind’ of its judgement.

At least the illusionists position as an entertainer would be a more genuine one, in that he would admit of nothing else except to provide entertainment.

It is clear that this idea of local currencies or complementary currencies in their adoption, falls into the same category as that given by an illusionists performance, mere entertainment.

Using desperate people in disadvantaged communities, who more so would fall victim to the predatory nature of bankers, to try and convince us and provide us with proofs of the authentic nature of complementary currencies, it finally has to be said, is stooping a little low. Using comfortable people in advantaged communities, who more so would be gullible enough to fall victim to the predatory nature of bankers, it must also be said, is stooping a little low.

Take this to mean that we are all in the same boat, the desperate and the comfortable together. All victims of ‘the bankers lie of economy’.

With this stratagem of ‘switch and bait’, we are to face and accept the very same ‘fundamental lie’, which is ‘the bankers lie of economy’ – all over again. A ‘lie’ which has brought us to our current predicament of economic upheaval in allowing a publisher to take on the role of magician, spelt ‘b-a-n-k-e-r’.


The central theme which we must ‘never lose sight’ of, is that we cannot have ‘anyone’, whether in the guise of well-meaning businesses or ‘community backed support’ or some other emotive ‘label’, claiming that they are the one’s who provide the means for a currency to be issued. This is exactly the current position of the bankers and their ‘lie of economy’.

It is we who individually issue our own currency by instructing a publisher with our ‘order’ to do business, for him to print what is representative of our work. The work is ours and the currency represents our work, and therefore we own and issue the currency for ourselves. There is nothing that has been given to us, issued to us, or ‘provided’ for us. The ownership of currency or ‘capital’ has always remained ours. We must not be deceived into ‘thinking’ otherwise.

This cannot be stressed enough. We individually issue our own individual currency, not a group of well-meaning businesses or some ‘vague’ general term likened to ‘the backing of the communities resources’. Your individual effort of back-breaking work, your ‘evidence‘ to that work. Whether you agree to work together or not, you each provide your own evidence of the work you have fulfilled as promised or that you will fulfill as promised. Not some other third party or vaguely described emotive entity called ‘community’. The nuance of language in making this distinction would, for some, appear to be minor and not of great importance, however, it lies at the very heart of our current economic problems today.

Those well-meaning businesses or ‘the community backed issuance of currencies’ that we read of in the article under examination, ‘The Crime of Alleviating Poverty: A Local Community Currency Battles the Central Bank of Kenya’ , must never be given undue importance, or be seen or construed as anything else other than ‘publishers’ of our currencies, which currencies represent proofs or evidence of our promises made to each other. To think otherwise, would condemn us yet again to debt slavery.

Finally, for any of this knowledge to ‘bear fruit’, there is another extremely crucial matter which is not to be ignored – Jurisdiction. This is knowing where ‘true economy’ is to take place: see article, THE REAL DANGER published 21st June 2013.