UNDERSTANDING THE CORPORATE POLITICAL ENTITY OF CANADA
AND THE RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE WITHIN AND WITHOUT ITS TERRITORIES
RIGHTS – WITHIN & WITHOUT
“Almost all people are hypnotics. The proper authority saw to it that the proper belief should be induced, and the people believed properly.”
― Charles Fort
(Note.- The explanation for the reasoning given for the analysis of the definition of Canada follows its analysis.)
The Legislative-legal Definition of Canada
Convention Between the Government of Canada and the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
1. In this Convention, unless the context otherwise requires:
(a) (i) the term “Canada” used in a geographical sense, means the territory of Canada, including any area beyond the territorial waters of Canada which is an area where Canada may, in accordance with its national legislation and international law, exercise sovereign rights with respect to the sea-bed and sub-soil and their natural resources
ANALYSIS OF ARTICLE 3
used in a geographic sense
– Is this to mean, in a geographic sense the territories of the imagination, or creations of the mind, as intellectual property (mere fiction as sensations of the mind alone) ?
– is this to mean, in a geographic sense the territories of the physical world (the world of the five senses) ?
means the territory of Canada
– The geographic sense being spoken of, therefore means, the territory of the imagination as fiction, since Canada is a fiction
– “Canada”…means…a fiction;
the fiction being the copywritten or copyrighted creation of the mind, as an intellectual property right, of a personally owned private fictitious business corporate country known as Canada.
– This term, “including”, means, “made up of (entirely)”.
– Following the term, “including”, we expect to read a listing of real things (real nouns) that the country of Canada can only ‘claim’ to have jurisdiction over, which will also mean jurisdiction over those objects to be found residing or admitting of that territory
– Aside from the ‘real nouns’ given that follow the term, “including”, everything else amounts to opinion in the nature of fictions or privately held beliefs
The physical locations that make up the entire territory of Canada are as follows
– beyond the territorial waters (sea, as the Exclusive Economic Zone)
an area where Canada may…exercise sovereign rights
with respect to
– the seabed
Definitions with other countries Canada has tax treaties with, provide for the same result on analysis.
Department of Finance Canada
Tax Treaties : In Force
Illustration of Claimed Physical Geographic Territories of Countries
The only physical territories countries may ‘claim’ to operate from, in order that ‘their’ constitutional-legislative laws do not interfere with ‘freewill’, are therefore those territories where the living are commonly not to be found alive and well –
See pages 18 – 21
Maritime Zones and Jurisdictions
After reading, What is Intellectual Property?, in the “About IP” (Intellectual Property) menu selection from the World Intellectual Property Organization (wipo) website, go on to discover that the country of Canada is copywritten personally owned private fictitious intellectual property, by simply ‘seeing’ its constitution appear in the wipo database.
What is Intellectual Property?
Within the wipo search box, type –
Search results –
Copywritten Constitution of Canada
Constitution of Canada (Canadian Constitution Acts, 1867 to 1982)
Canada (71 texts)
Explanation for the reasoning behind Canada’s analysis.
A Primer On Fictions In Exposing Their Dangers –
The informations to follow reproduced here, are from correspondence found in letters, demonstrating that what people take as being obvious and think to be absurdly simple and therefoe without relevance, are likely in fact to be the most crucial and important far reaching knowledge they could ever come to learn.
It is to be remembered that the most obvious and simplest of things, most often than not, provide for the key to understanding the most complex of things.
The challenge remains with the reader to confirm for themselves whether this is true. Here then follows that challenge for the reader to find out the truth of this for themselves –
by now, if you’ve had time, you may have reached a point that seems a little odd when we look at the factual basis of what a kingdom, country, state, province, region, and so on, can only be.
The key lies in knowing what the difference is between real things and fictional things? That is to say, things of the imagination as fictions.
Although what I am going to say seems foolishly basic, it is crucial to appreciate the significance of what is being said.
We know something is real by using our five senses. If you can see something, hear something, smell something, taste something, and finally touch something, then you know it is real. That’s what our senses are for, to make us aware of real things.
When you deal with a word symbolising and pointing to something that is meant to be real, for example land, then somebody who does not know what that is, can be shown it by just using your finger to point to it, and immediately they can ‘see’ for themselves what that word-symbol points to, and also with their sense of ‘sight’ they can confirm it as being something real, that is to say something in the real world, the physical world. It needs no further explanation or description as a word.
It does not matter what form the land takes, it remains land, such as a hill, valley etc. These forms of land all can be confirmed as real with the ‘sense’ of sight.
A long time ago people used to describe themselves as coming from the ‘land of’, now they describe themselves as coming from the ‘country of’, or ‘province of’, or ‘state of’, etc., without reference to land.
A big key that helps you unlock the knowledge that you are dealing with fictional or fictitious things, figments of someone’s imagination, is that they tend to need explanation and are very difficult to point to with your finger.
If we take countries, we must be suspicious as to what they represent because they keep changing names, whereas real things always maintain the same name. A chair will always retain the name chair, although there are different types of chair.
Land will always retain the name land, even though it may take different forms, and so we say that the land has taken the form of a hill for example.
So fictions need a long description to explain them, which we come to learn through their explanation, and also it is not easy to point to them in the real world. Furthermore, they tend to change names, whereas real things do not. Land remains land and we find it in the territory of the real world of physical existence confirmed with our five senses, as opposed to the territory of someone’s imagination. Imagination being simply sensations of the mind alone.
The big clue with knowing that countries etc., are fictions or figments of someone’s imagination, is finding their creation dates, as well as the clue of maps being labeled ‘political maps’. Politics being someone’s personal ideas of how we should relate to each other or their description of spacial (or spatial) perception, and therefore a figment of their imagination, their fantasy.
We can of course agree with them or simply disagree with them, nonetheless, it is their personal opinion, their imaginative creation or fiction, as to how we should relate with each other.
That is why their ‘personal thoughts’ of how they see the world’s territories does not relate to the land, but relates to a ‘political’ map, the word political indicating personal opinion as fiction and not the reality of the physical world we confirm with our senses.
Here is proof of what is being said –
List of sovereign states by date of formation –
List of national constitutions –
Constitutions create countries and are classified as ‘written instruments’ under the term charters or political charters –
Maps marked political maps –
Note.- All terms relating to political maps, therefore relate to fictional ideas, like for example, nation, state, etc.
Political maps therefore, do not relate to the physical world as it ‘is’ discovered through the five senses, but they just refer to someone’s personal opinion, or fiction, of how they choose to internally percieve the world. And that is why they are termed political maps, politics being of course a matter of personal opinion, that is to say someone’s imaginative ideas, figments of the imagination, flights of fancy, or plain old ‘fictions’, of how they perceive relationships mapped out on paper.
And that is exactly where countries can ‘only’ be found, on the pieces of paper that created them commonly known as constitutions, as well as being visually depicted on other pieces of paper called maps, that have absolutely no relationship to the real world of things, except to ‘psychologically’ delude.
We can conclude that the territory of countries being spoken about, can be found only within the imagination of those that created them and also the imagination of those that agree, although they really do not understand what it is they agreed to, simply because they do not understand the vital importance of not confusing real things with fictional things.
Well, that is enough for now, except to begin to think about ‘where’ it is you make an income or living ? In the territories of the physical world, the world of the five senses, or the territories of the imaginative world, the world of someone’s fantasy.
That being said, you may come to understand this written material a little better, starting from the subheading,
TO BE OR NOT TO BE – THE CHOICE IS YOURS TO MAKE.
RULE THYSELF LEST YE BE RULED
I hope you got through the first letter without great difficulty and that you were stimulated into understanding how you see things as they ‘are’ using your five senses alone, without any thoughts, opinions, or feelings of what it is that your five senses presented. No idea’s involved whatsoever, just five senses showing real things in the physical world as they ‘are’.
And that most definitely means having to stop imposing ‘thoughts’ on others, any thoughts, particularly that of ‘learnt’ history. Meaning what is thought of them, their origins, background, character, and so on. It is vitally important to do this so that a clearer and more accurate perception of what it is that is under investigation with regards to the subject is obtained.
This is done to try and discover the real and underlying objects of anything presented, so that when, after temporarily suspending thoughts, thoughts can then more clearly operate with a more realistic picture of what it is that is under investigation.
Here, I would like to mention a word that a lot of people are confused by.
The word is, ‘include’.
Some of the other forms of the same word are,
‘includes, included, including.
The word ‘include’ quite simply means,
‘made up of’.
When the word include is used, it is known as an ‘exclusionary word’, because it excludes everything that is not listed with its use, or that is not listed after its use in a sentence.
That simply means, when we see something being spoken about with the word ‘include’ present, or its various forms, we wait to see a list of ‘all’ the things that make up that thing being spoken about. It must be just only the full list of all things that make up the final thing being spoken about. Everything else then is excluded and ignored. That is why ‘include’ is said to be an exclusionary word or term.
For example when we see a cake, and someone says,
“this cake’s ingredients includes…”.
Well, we wait to hear what all the ingredients are that made up the cake we see. We need a list of the full or entire ingredients, not just some of them. In otherwords, a full list of the entire ingredients that made up the cake that we see in front of us. In that way we know what the cake was made up of, and only what the cake was made up of. Everything is then listed for the ingredients of that cake after the word ‘includes’.
As with the cake, we can expect this for everything else too, because that is what the use of the word ‘include’, or its other forms, means has to happen.
Why is this important ?
This is important because it goes back to what was spoken about in the first correspondence on,
‘real things’ and ‘fictitious (or fictional) things’.
We understand where real things are to be found. They are to be found in the territory of the physical world of reality or existence, which we confirm with our five senses of,
sight, hearing, smell, taste, and touch.
We also know that fictitious things are figments of someone’s imagination, that are simply sensations of the mind alone, and are therefore to be found in the territory of the imagination.
An example of such ‘fictitious things’ are countries, that can be communicated and created on paper, when we see the use of the terms ‘political charters (constitutions)’, indicating to us that countries are fictions with the use of the term political being used. And that we come to know of their ‘imaginative’ existence, only when they are written down for us to ‘learn’ about them.
We also come to ‘learn’ how these fictions ‘spatially’ relate, or relate in space to each other, in the territory of the mind that imagined them, when their ‘spacial (or spatial) conception’ in the territory of that persons mind, are also shown on paper, to help communicate the fiction they have imagined.
The paper that shows and communicates these spacial personally owned imaginings of countries in somebodies mind, are called political maps (or ordinances).
Why are they said to be personally owned ?
Because simply you did not create them, and are therefore not yours to own. They are ‘written instruments’ owned by the person or persons who created them directly, or had them created through their representatives.
And of course, were you to create something, it would belong to you and you could patent or copywrite it. By copywriting it, that is how people would know that there is an owner behind what it is they are reading, and what they would be reading could not be, or ever be, their ‘property’. The property would clearly belong to somebody else.
The document being read, would then obviously be a personally owned private document or ‘written instrument’ as someone’s property.
Back to Countries
Now, since countries are personally owned private fictions, and being somebodies fictions, as their imaginative property that they created, it follows that they are obviously free to believe in their imaginative fictitious creations for themselves. And that other people may agree to believe in these fictions and follow whatever it is they instruct.
Other people may also not agree to believe in these fictions, and not follow whatever it is that they instruct. Which ever the case, it is left for them to agree or to not agree. By agreeing, they clearly have contracted to do so, since contract simply means agreement. By not agreeing, they clearly have not contracted.
An idea that you hold personally as your private fiction, can not obviously be imposed on someone who does not hold to the same idea. Of course, people may agree to be bound by an idea, but that is entirely up to them. They can equally not agree to engaging in the business of someone’s idea, and that would be fine too. This agreeing or not agreeing, of course, applies to everyone equally.
To make, threaten, or force someone to agree or to disagree would be to make them into a slave.
Now that we understand that, then this whole idea must be the same for personally owned private countries.
In other words, personally owned private fictitious countries, cannot make rules to force people to agree or to disagree. All individuals, have equal freewill to choose what they agree to for themselves, and they and their individual freewill are to be found in the the territory of the physical world of nature.
Wait a minute !!!! Hmmmm….what has been said here, could all be nonsense.
So the best place to find out, if this is all true, is to go to the people with the experts to know, and read what they say about their countries when they give a legislative definition of their countries in making contractual deals with each other.
It must not be forgotten that these are ‘precise’ legal or legislative terms in these documents, and define who, as countries, the parties to these deals are, and where they are to be found, meaning their territory, so that they do not impose on people’s choice that freewill gives them.
Of course, if having read the definitions, you agree that is ‘where’ you make your income or a living, then fine, go ahead and follow their laws and start paying up for things like taxes for being where a country is said to be found by their governments.
Definition of countries and knowing what they are ‘made up of’ when looking at the word ‘include’ and its different forms to define them –
Note.- Do not forget. What needs to be found are words as symbols that point to ‘real things’, or ‘real nouns’, to be found in the physical world, listed after the word ‘include’, meaning ‘made up of’.
The real nouns listed after the word include (or its differing forms), can only be therefore, those real things listed that will go to ‘make up’ the entire country, nothing else.
THE LEGISLATIVE-LEGAL DEFINITION OF A COUNTRY CAN BE FOUND IN ARTICLE 3, SOMETIMES GIVEN AS ARTICLE III –
Go through the link below systematically and carefully, to learn how to find these definitions. Use common sense and be patient taking the advise of the instructions in the link, if asked to do so.
Once the definitions are found, practice finding them in different countries, states, provinces, etc., websites. Usually the websites of finance ministries or tax authorities, using the search terms,
‘double taxation treaties’ or
‘tax treaty/treaties’ or
‘tax agreement/s’ or
‘double taxation convention’ or
‘tax convention’ or
‘tax information exchange agreements’ (abbreviated to TIEA)
WHERE AM I
(Follow the instructions and open links to find the legislative definition of a country)
POLITICAL CHARTERS OF CANADA
Act of Parliament & Charter of Incorporation (1825), PDF
Act of Parliament & Charter of Incorporation (1825)
Lands to be disposed of by the Canada company, incorporated by Royal charter and Act of Parliament in 1826. Climate, soil, and productions (1833), PDF
Lands to be disposed of by the Canada company, incorporated by Royal charter and Act of Parliament in 1826. Climate, soil, and productions (1833)
Charter of incorporation [microform] : 19th August, 1826 (1832), PDF
Charter of incorporation [microform] : 19th August, 1826 (1832)
List of the proprietors of the Canada Company [microform] : incorporated by Royal Charter, 19th August, 1826, office, no. 13, St. Helen’s Place (1829), PDF
List of the proprietors of the Canada Company [microform] : incorporated by Royal Charter, 19th August, 1826, office, no. 13, St. Helen’s Place (1829)
As an aside, an attachment provides for further material to give the context, and proofs, with which the rights of people can be better understood.
Taken from that attachment and shown here, is material that attempts to form a complete and integral framework of concepts with which to orientate the mind when rights and freedoms are explored –
THE BUSINESS OF KNOWING YOUR PLACE
HISTORIES OF THE CORPORATE POLITICAL ENTITY KNOWN AS CANADA
& INTERESTS CEDING THEIR CORPORATE POLITICAL ENTITIES TO IT TO FORM ITS UNION
The constitution of Canada in its history and practical working (1917)
The constitution of Canada (1889)
CONTEXT & PROOFS
Defanging the Snake –
WAKE UP YOU’RE BEING TAKEN FOR A FOOL – DECONSTRUCTING TERMS
Once it becomes factually established how money creation comes into being, and that a publisher has no claim to an entitlement that is not or ever can be his, then regardless of the mechanism used to publish other people’s entitlement when they create and issue money, by no means does this alter the facts, that the publisher is not the creator and issuer of money.
Armed with the factual knowledge of how money creation truly works and comes into being, then one can see the clear laughable nonsense proposed by those involved in the debate on money creation in Iceland, and more so, how they have little care in insulting people’s intelligence to think that the drivel they propose, will not be held up to scrutiny as can be seen by reading this news article –
Iceland looks at ending boom and bust with radical money plan
The following is nonsensical drivel and an attempt to take away your freewill and enslave you permanently, by eradicating the possibility of you ever coming to learn that ‘you’ are the creator and issuer of money, which ownership has always belonged to you and not a publisher (bank). The ownership of money can only of course belong to ‘you’, as it represents ‘your entitlement’ to represent your livelihood –
Citi Economist Says It Might Be Time to Abolish Cash
INDICATION OF ACTUAL TERMINAL IRRECOVERABLE BANKRUPTCY AND COLLAPSE
Now that the banker’s lie of economy can be thoroughly grasped and understood with the explanation given by Mathematically Perfected Economy, we can now see that negative interest rates are governments offer to artificially borrow themselves into debt by slowing down repayments towards the deflationary effects of the banker’s lie of economy, until such time they have themselves positioned to be able to control the ensuing chaos that automatic and irreversible collapse is about to bring into people’s lives.
Nonetheless, the artificial debt which they, the government, together with their paymasters (the Self-Ennobling Ones, their self-validating clergy and their bankers) have connived to work so hard towards, in bringing about the terminal and irreversible deflationary effects of artificial debt that will crush people’s personal economies and confiscate real possessions, including land, will continue to grow and withdraw the money supply; since all of the money supply is a deception, based on artificial debt, together with that which exists beyond actual physical money that equates to production, brought about simply because of the ‘further’ compounding enslaving mechanism of interest charges, all combining together, to be paid back as false earnings to the private central banking corporations –
Within one year, Europe went from a debt crisis to a f***ing free-for-all with negative borrowing rates
For a brief further explanation of the deflationary effects of the bankers lie of economy, scroll down to the explanation given in the sub-heading,
UNDERSTANDING THE SIMPLE TRUTH OF CORRECT ECONOMICS TO PROVIDE THE TRUE CONTEXT FOR INTERPRETING ECONOMIC DATA –
POLAND CONFIRMATION OF COLLAPSE
Further Reference Sources:
SLAVERY BY CONSENT TO CORPORATE FICTIONS AS COUNTRIES
SLAVERY BY CONSENT TO CORPORATE FICTIONS AS COUNTRIES II
The original incorporation charter of Krakow
More Fictitious Ordinances –
The Plans of Medieval Polish Towns
Note.- In the first page of the document under the title ‘Abstract’, we read as follows –
‘The first charters were granted at the beginning of the thirteenth century. By the end of the fifteenth century as many as 800 towns were chartered.’
Just browse, no need to really open and read the further links to be found in the following –
ALICE’S ADVENTURES IN CORPORATE LAND
CHARTERS – THERE’S JUST NO GETTING AWAY FROM THEM
Country-specific Lists of Double Taxation Treaties
Tax Treaties Database
History of Tax Treaties
Tax treaties for students
FURTHER PROOFS –
*  British parliament to look into Prince Charles’s veto power over laws
United Kingdom Constitution
The Constitution of the United Kingdom is not in a single, written document, but is
drawn from statutes, treaties, court judgments, parliamentary constitutional
conventions, and numerous other sources.
Political Charters Create Corporate Countries As Fictions
Given an understanding of the nature of constitutions, it becomes clear as to why the following can be seen to make sense –
28 U.S. Code § 3002 – Definitions
(15) “United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States.
In the phrase given as, ‘of the United States’, what is the United States ?
(A) a Federal corporation
Given an appreciation of the personally owned private corporate nature of countries, as they should quite rightly be understood, the necessity of the US representatives presence in London to secure agreement with HM Government with regards to social security arrangements, becomes clearer –
Statutory Instruments 1997 No. 1778 SOCIAL SECURITY – The Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997
When taking into ‘full-context’ Prince Charles’ veto powers, the information that is required reading, can be found under the subtitled heading, SEQUENCE OF DOING BUSINESS USING WRITTEN INSTRUMENTS AS CONTRACTS, to be found part way down the document –
THE BUSINESS OF KNOWING YOUR PLACE
The participants behind the corporate instruments discussed, cannot be criticized as acting improperly when it comes to their personal affairs. Nonetheless, where they maybe open to criticism, will lie with a lack of obvious, open, fair, and clear disclosure, not made available and offered to parties who attach to any of their written instruments through their agencies directly, or attach by means of third parties.
Without full-disclosure being given, and the means closed to people to conduct their personal and private affairs without corporate interference, people become susceptible to the condition of documentary peonage, that is to say, involuntary slavery through documentation; particularly slavery brought on by the use of the bankers lie of economy to pay for artificial debts as taxes, as well as other money confiscatory schemes that confiscate property and the means through which people can make a livelihood for themselves –
RULE THYSELF LEST YE BE RULED
* Lawful precedes legal, and therefore the requirements of lawfulness must be met first for legality to proceed.
Of documentary peonage
Definition of Peonage
Peonage is a type of involuntary servitude
Definition of Involuntary Servitude
Slavery; the condition of an individual who works for another individual against his or her will as a result of force, coercion, or imprisonment, regardless of whether the individual is paid for the labor.
We read –
(6) Involuntary servitude
The term “involuntary servitude” includes a condition of servitude induced by means of—
(A) any scheme, plan, or pattern intended to cause a person to believe that, if the person did not enter into or continue in such condition, that person or another person would suffer serious harm or physical restraint; or
(B) the abuse or threatened abuse of the legal process.
Definition of coercion
The action or practice of persuading someone to do something by using force or threats
There is always an underlying threat of violence if you fail to comply with corporate government. Their coercion then, lies with this underlying threat of violence and their lack of full disclosure as to the nature of their organisation as being a, personally owned private fictitious coorporation, which failure of disclosure forms the basis with which the conditions of involuntary slavery can be achieved.
Fortunately, whether they know it or not, all public servants, regardless of where they happen to be, or which office they happen to occupy, are responsible for their personal actions in and out of office, no matter the position they hold. Ignorance of the law is no excuse when this is understood in the light of –
PUBLIC SERVICE, COMMON SENSE AND THE LAW – PART I
Who Are You Kidding !!!
Supreme court clears way for release of secret Prince Charles letters
Well, what do we have here ?
As for damaging kingship, what does it matter when you personally own a private corporate country. And as will be realised environmental issues under the rubric of sustainability are not to be dismissed or taken lightly as having no serious impact on the lives of people everywhere on the planet.
Who would have thought a little necessary and embarassing controversy as theatre, to lead those a little naive away from the smell of the hunt, would really affect the plans of the High Contracting Powers as a price they accept to convince people that they are in fact helpless and powerless and that the well timed exposure of themselves, is proof that all eyes and attention, of where true power is held, should be diverted away from them. After all, they hold mere meaningless titles, it is to be thought, that stand and are to be taken as the mere curiosity of the traditions of pagentry in times long past, for the gleefull enthrallment of tourists and a reminder of man’s achievements in reason, by quelling reckless power-crazed monarchs, who so good-heartedly gave up their ambitions entitled to them from divinity.
Of note, we must not forget the Self-Ennoblings Ones and their self-validating clergy’s sole purpose ‘to be’, and what those beliefs are that provide for that purpose. Otherwise, why the need to maintain their underlying structures –
Divine Right of Kings
If we consider that all men are ‘equally endowed’ by nature’s Cause with ‘innate freewill’, then the information we find in reading what is said about the Divine Right of Kings, as well as what is said concerning ‘the Church’, is something of a curiosity, since the Will of God, we would reasonably deduce in relation to man, is quite clear when it comes to all men everywhere – who are endowed with ‘an equal measure of freewill before nature’s Cause or nature’s God’, without exception in the realm of the physical world.
The source of a rebellion to what man sees as God’s Will, on the matter of freewill, would not be God as the source of rebellion contradicting Himself; we would reasonably deduce regarding ‘equal freewill’ in all men, but the source of rebellion, if we look to Heaven for heavenly authority and the source of what God would not make absurd in us, would then be an alternative to God’s Authority and the use by men of that ‘alternative authority’, in making ‘absurd’, equal innate freewill endowed by nature’s Cause or nature’s God in all men.
The High Acting Wizards, As Magicians, Behind The Authorship Of Political Charters On Behalf Of The Self-Ennobling One’s And Their Self-Validating Clergy, Are The Scribes –
MAGNA CARTA TODAY
Aspirations for the 800th Anniversary
Magna Carta and the US Constitution
The Legal 500
Magic Circle (law)
Taking the magic abroad
GENERAL HISTORICAL CONTEXT
The Papcy is not other than the ghost of the deceased Roman Empire, sitting crowned upon the grave thereof – Thomas Hobbes, English Philosopher 1588 – 1679
OF PRIESTS, MONEY CHANGERS AND SCRIBES
OF PRIESTS, MONEY CHANGERS AND SCRIBES – PART II
OF PRIESTS, MONEY CHANGERS AND SCRIBES – PART III
THE RULE OF LAW
GIVING THE ZOMBIES HELL AND EUGENICS II
SOLUTION IS NOT IN THE INTERESTS OF THE ELITE
CARTA / CHARTER – CREATING CHAOS TO BRING WORLD WIDE ORDER
ALL OF YOU ARE THE ENEMY – EBOLA I
ALL OF YOU ARE THE ENEMY – EBOLA II
ALL OF YOU ARE THE ENEMY – EBOLA III
THE POLISH STATE ONLY EXISTS IN THEORY; IN PRACTICE IT DOESN’T EXIST
EYE OF NEWT, AND TOE OF FROG – ACT I
EYE OF NEWT, AND TOE OF FROG – ACT II
EYE OF NEWT, TOE OF FROG – ACT III
EYE OF NEWT, TOE OF FROG – ACT IV
EYE OF NEWT, TOE OF FROG – ACT V
EYE OF NEWT, TOE OF FROG – ACT VI
For Educational Purposes Only
GIVING THE ZOMBIES HELL AND EUGENICS
If you cannot ‘see’ indications of a scheme to be rid of you and enslave those remaining, it’s high-time you woke up –
THE NEW “WATER BARONS”: WALL STREET MEGA-BANKS ARE BUYING UP THE WORLD’S WATER
One need only think where the jurisdictional territory of these bankers operations are to be found and also that their claim of wealth was obtained by not providing full disclosure of their lie of economy, which lie amounts to theft. All their talk of having you believe that they can buy up water all over the world, is of course fraudulent nonsense alongside all the other corporations that engage in genocidal conceived ideas.
You vill all poison your children and yourselves with blood contaminants or face ze consequences, by order of mein führer –
Abbott government to announce anti-vaccination parents will lose benefits
Media panics over measles cases, but gives government a pass for housing possible Ebola patients in hotels open to the public
British Hypocrisy and War Crimes, Triumphalism and a “Corporate Covenant”
Nordic countries extend military alliance in face of Russian aggression
Russia continues massive military modernization despite economic woes
Boston Defendant is Drugged & Defenseless
The events in the preceding material should be understood in the context given in the title subsection headed,
PRECAUTIONS TO TRAGEDY TAKE LITTLE TIME IN READING SIMPLY PRESENTED SOLUTION,
to be found in the following link –