― Georges Braque


Fraud and falsehood only dread examination. Truth invites it.
― Samuel Johnson

Falsehood is never so successful as when she baits her hook with truth, and no opinions so fatally mislead us, as those that are not wholly wrong; as no watches so effectually deceive the wearer as those that are sometimes right
― Charles Caleb Colton English

The priest is the personification of falsehood
― Giuseppe Garibaldi

“The devil can cite Scripture for his purpose.”
― William Shakespeare, The Merchant of Venice


Giving the same value to fiction as to fact in the interest of so-called fairness is to mislead the American people and the press has become party to that.
Joe Wilson

The discovery of truth is prevented more effectively, not by the false appearance things present and which mislead into error, not directly by weakness of the reasoning powers, but by preconceived opinion, by prejudice.
Arthur Schopenhauer

Do not be misled by what you see around you, or be influenced by what you see. You live in a world which is a playground of illusion, full of false paths, false values and false ideals. But you are not part of that world.
Sai Baba

A man may imagine things that are false, but he can only understand things that are true, for if the things be false, the apprehension of them is not understanding.
Isaac Newton

A house must be built on solid foundations if it is to last. The same principle applies to man, otherwise he too will sink back into the soft ground and becomes swallowed up by the world of illusion.
Sai Baba

It’s discouraging to think how many people are shocked by honesty and how few by deceit.
Noël Coward, Blithe Spirit

In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
Desiderius Erasmus

God hath given you one face, and you make yourself another.
William Shakespeare, Hamlet



Zero Hedge nails it –
– Ray B. [“Debt Truth Committee” – massive, untenable debt loads across the government, financial and household sectors]
Posted on April 9, 2015 by Admin

Reference Article:

“Odious Debt” Has Finally Arrived: Greece To Write Off “Illegal” Debt



No surprises here.

What we all should learn to come to understand, is that a correct answer can be arrived at for the wrong reasons. Without the right reasons in arriving at the answer we are in danger of repeatedly being misled.

As for what has been said about Zero Hedge “nailing it”, we must remain alert to our own self-delusions, otherwise, as is historically evident time and time again, we are led straight back into confusion and slavery.

Zero Hedge’s article inspires hope, nonetheless, where we are misled by it, is that it maintains that debts are owed to banks and their proxies, except when they arose illegitimately.

The nonsense of this stance becomes self-evident when we understand how money is truely created and who owns and issues that money in its creation. Never mind even pointing out the fraudulent obfuscation on the part of the banks and their proxies that forms the basis by which, when presented and explained correctly, shows the banker’s mechanism of their lie of economy working to inevitably, and irreversibly collapse economies everywhere, for the purposes of confiscating the very world itself and those that live in it, as slaves.

And never mind that Zero Hedge fails to point out that the people of the world are being held to ransom by mere publishers, to whom it becomes impossible to owe a debt to, beyond that debt owed for only the costs of publishing.

Never mind that at all, although it is crucial and forms the beginnings of the central reasons to explain why Greece and the rest of the world are in irreversible economic collapse, without which clear and correct explanation, there is no way out.

Further, when we examine the nature of constitutions, the countries created by them and the governments operating under their authority, then one wonders why on earth Zero Hedge would take the position that it has, by accepting that debts can be owed to bankers, with the exception of confirming this lie, with the distraction of Dubious Debts temptingly held in front of us, instead of pointing out that it is impossible to owe a debt to a publisher masquerading as a finance house , or to owe a debt to their proxies for that matter, especially given that these so-called debts apply to only fictitious entities, that crucially failed to provide for the true nature of their operations through lack of necessary, obvious, fair and full disclosure, as is contractually required, to each and every individual they engaged to do business with, whether directly or through third-parties, and that they still deliberately continue to fail to provide for full disclosure, as to the true nature of their business operations.

Full disclosure is particularly crucial with regards to the true nature of what Greece and its government are really operating as, and where their operations take place, as will soon be discovered.

The immense power and authority for the taking if they want it, given to those who discover that they were not provided with ‘full disclosure’, is terrible indeed. For nature’s Cause demands full disclosure be provided, otherwise its lack of provision made clear and obvious, in proportion to the damage and distruction caused as a consequence of the lack of its provision, would justify and necessitate, a proportionate punishment to those responsible for not providing obvious, clear, and fair full disclosure, to reflect nature’s Causes wrath, in defying and being in opposition to nature’s Causes or natrue’s Gods truth in creation –



For the sake of clarity, which clarity Zero Hedge had failed to alert its readers to, in not making it clear, that international law applies to ‘fictions’ and those found to reside within a fiction.

A somewhat further worrying observation to make, is that of people not being aware of how to distinguish between reality and fiction, and the dangers that can ensue in their lives if they do not appreciate the absolutely disastrous consequences of not coming to a simple understanding of these distinctions, which dangers the people of Greece and all of us, are now in the throes of.


OF FICTIONS (The world of the imagination)

How do we know something is real, that it is of the physical world

– The physical world is to be found through the five senses (The world of the five senses)

– No name changes

How do we know something is not real, that it is a fiction not of the physical world

i) The fictional world is not to be found through the five senses,

and when there is doubt,

ii) Look for name changes

We must clearly understand, that the imaginative space of the mind can create geographies and territories of its own, and since these geographies and territories have the sense of imagination only, they are of course not real

We can say, fictions in a geographic sense can be found in the territory of the imagination, or

a fiction as imagination in a geographic sense can be found in the territory of a fiction as imagination, or

a fiction is to be found in a fiction as imagination, or

a fiction means we will always find it in a fiction, or

a fiction means a fiction

Conclusion –

What is thought or imagined by a person is then a fiction.

The fiction being thought about, belongs to the person whose imagination created it.

An idea is a fiction belonging to the person whose imagination created it.

That fiction is of course then, a personally owned private idea, coming from the persons imagination who was responsible for creating it.

Fictions belong to an individuals imagination or are an individuals creation of the mind, and are therefore –

personally owned private fictitious property belonging to an individual

Fictions are then regarded as Intellectual Property and can of course be registered by an individual as property belonging to them

When an individual registers, for recording purposes only, their fiction as belonging to them,

i) other people learn of that personally owned private fiction when it is communicated on paper

ii) other people, on finding that that fiction has been registered,

– understand that fiction, to be personally owned private property because it had been registered,

by the creator or inventor of the fiction, or registered

by the creators or inventors representatives

– understand that the fiction cannot possibly belong to them if they have use of it

– understand that the fictions exploitation is for the benefit of its creator only, as is obviously his entitlement, as the owner of his imaginative creation

– understand that the fiction’s owner, can change the name of his fiction as many times as he wants, simply because it is his fiction to do with as he pleases



A Primer On Fictions In Exposing Their Dangers –

The informations to follow reproduced here, are from correspondence found in letters, demonstrating that what people take as being obvious and think to be absurdly simple and therefore without relevance, are likely in fact to be the most crucial and important far reaching knowledge they could ever come to learn.

It is to be remembered that the most obvious and simplest of things, most often than not, provide for the key to understanding the most complex of things.

The challenge remains with the reader to confirm for themselves whether this is true. Here then follows that challenge for the reader to find out the truth of this for themselves –



by now, if you’ve had time, you may have reached a point that seems a little odd when we look at the factual basis of what a kingdom, country, state, province, region, and so on, can only be.

The key lies in knowing what the difference is between real things and fictional things? That is to say, things of the imagination as fictions.

Although what I am going to say seems foolishly basic, it is crucial to appreciate the significance of what is being said.

We know something is real by using our five senses. If you can see something, hear something, smell something, taste something, and finally touch something, then you know it is real. That’s what our senses are for, to make us aware of real things.

When you deal with a word symbolising and pointing to something that is meant to be real, for example land, then somebody who does not know what that is, can be shown it by just using your finger to point to it, and immediately they can ‘see’ for themselves what that word-symbol points to, and also with their sense of ‘sight’ they can confirm it as being something real, that is to say something in the real world, the physical world. It needs no further explanation or description as a word.

It does not matter what form the land takes, it remains land, such as a hill, valley etc. These forms of land all can be confirmed as real with the ‘sense’ of sight.

A long time ago people used to describe themselves as coming from the ‘land of’, now they describe themselves as coming from the ‘country of’, or ‘province of’, or ‘state of’, etc., without reference to land.

A big key that helps you unlock the knowledge that you are dealing with fictional or fictitious things, figments of someone’s imagination, is that they tend to need explanation and are very difficult to point to with your finger.

If we take countries, we must be suspicious as to what they represent because they keep changing names, whereas real things always maintain the same name. A chair will always retain the name chair, although there are different types of chair.

Land will always retain the name land, even though it may take different forms, and so we say that the land has taken the form of a hill for example.

So fictions need a long description to explain them, which we come to learn through their explanation, and also it is not easy to point to them in the real world. Furthermore, they tend to change names, whereas real things do not. Land remains land and we find it in the territory of the real world of physical existence confirmed with our five senses, as opposed to the territory of someone’s imagination. Imagination being simply sensations of the mind alone.

The big clue with knowing that countries etc., are fictions or figments of someone’s imagination, is finding their creation dates, as well as the clue of maps being labeled ‘political maps’. Politics being someone’s personal ideas of how we should relate to each other or their description of spacial (or spatial) perception, and therefore a figment of their imagination, their fantasy.

We can of course agree with them or simply disagree with them, nonetheless, it is their personal opinion, their imaginative creation or fiction, as to how we should relate with each other.

That is why their ‘personal thoughts’ of how they see the world’s territories does not relate to the land, but relates to a ‘political’ map, the word political indicating personal opinion as fiction and not the reality of the physical world we confirm with our senses.

Here is proof of what is being said –

List of sovereign states by date of formation –

List of national constitutions –

Constitutions create countries and are classified as ‘written instruments’ under the term charters or political charters –

Category:Political charters

Maps marked political maps –

Note.- All terms relating to political maps, therefore relate to fictional ideas, like for example, nation, state, etc.

Political maps therefore, do not relate to the physical world as it ‘is’ discovered through the five senses, but they just refer to someone’s personal opinion, or fiction, of how they choose to internally percieve the world. And that is why they are termed political maps, politics being of course a matter of personal opinion, that is to say someone’s imaginative ideas, figments of the imagination, flights of fancy, or plain old ‘fictions’, of how they perceive relationships mapped out on paper.

And that is exactly where countries can ‘only’ be found, on the pieces of paper that created them commonly known as constitutions, as well as being visually depicted on other pieces of paper called maps, that have absolutely no relationship to the real world of things, except to ‘psychologically’ delude.

We can conclude that the territory of countries being spoken about, can be found only within the imagination of those that created them and also the imagination of those that agree, although they really do not understand what it is they agreed to, simply because they do not understand the vital importance of not confusing real things with fictional things.

Well, that is enough for now, except to begin to think about ‘where’ it is you make an income or living ? In the territories of the physical world, the world of the five senses, or the territories of the imaginative world, the world of someone’s fantasy.

That being said, you may come to understand this written material a little better, starting from the subheading,


(Nature’s Cause As The Only Exceptional Fiction – Cause & Effect)


Hello again,

I hope you got through the first letter without great difficulty and that you were stimulated into understanding how you see things as they ‘are’ using your five senses alone, without any thoughts, opinions, or feelings of what it is that your five senses presented. No idea’s involved whatsoever, just five senses showing real things in the physical world as they ‘are’.

And that most definitely means having to stop imposing ‘thoughts’ on others, any thoughts, particularly that of ‘learnt’ history. Meaning what is thought of them, their origins, background, character, and so on. It is vitally important to do this so that a clearer and more accurate perception of what it is that is under investigation with regards to the subject is obtained.

This is done to try and discover the real and underlying objects of anything presented, so that when, after temporarily suspending thoughts, thoughts can then more clearly operate with a more realistic picture of what it is that is under investigation.

Here, I would like to mention a word that a lot of people are confused by.

The word is, ‘include’.

Some of the other forms of the same word are,

‘includes, included, including.

The word ‘include’ quite simply means,

‘made up of’.

When the word include is used, it is known as an ‘exclusionary word’, because it excludes everything that is not listed with its use, or that is not listed after its use in a sentence.

That simply means, when we see something being spoken about with the word ‘include’ present, or its various forms, we wait to see a list of ‘all’ the things that make up that thing being spoken about. It must be just only the full list of all things that make up the final thing being spoken about. Everything else then is excluded and ignored. That is why ‘include’ is said to be an exclusionary word or term.

For example when we see a cake, and someone says,

“this cake’s ingredients includes…”.

Well, we wait to hear what all the ingredients are that made up the cake we see. We need a list of the full or entire ingredients, not just some of them. In otherwords, a full list of the entire ingredients that made up the cake that we see in front of us. In that way we know what the cake was made up of, and only what the cake was made up of. Everything is then listed for the ingredients of that cake after the word ‘includes’.

As with the cake, we can expect this for everything else too, because that is what the use of the word ‘include’, or its other forms, means has to happen.

Why is this important ?

This is important because it goes back to what was spoken about in the first correspondence on,

‘real things’ and ‘fictitious (or fictional) things’.

We understand where real things are to be found. They are to be found in the territory of the physical world of reality or existence, which we confirm with our five senses of,

sight, hearing, smell, taste, and touch.

We also know that fictitious things are figments of someone’s imagination, that are simply sensations of the mind alone, and are therefore to be found in the territory of the imagination.

An example of such ‘fictitious things’ are countries, that can be communicated and created on paper, when we see the use of the terms ‘political charters (constitutions)’, indicating to us that countries are fictions with the use of the term political being used. And that we come to know of their ‘imaginative’ existence, only when they are written down for us to ‘learn’ about them.

We also come to ‘learn’ how these fictions ‘spatially’ relate, or relate in space to each other, in the territory of the mind that imagined them, when their ‘spacial (or spatial) conception’ in the territory of that persons mind, are also shown on paper, to help communicate the fiction they have imagined.

The paper that shows and communicates these spacial personally owned imaginings of countries in somebodies mind, are called political maps (or ordinances).

Why are they said to be personally owned ?

Because simply you did not create them, and are therefore not yours to own. They are ‘written instruments’ owned by the person or persons who created them directly, or had them created through their representatives.

And of course, were you to create something, it would belong to you and you could patent or copywrite it. By copywriting it, that is how people would know that there is an owner behind what it is they are reading, and what they would be reading could not be, or ever be, their ‘property’. The property would clearly belong to somebody else.

The document being read, would then obviously be a personally owned private document or ‘written instrument’ as someone’s property.

Back to Countries

Now, since countries are personally owned private fictions, and being somebodies fictions, as their imaginative property that they created, it follows that they are obviously free to believe in their imaginative fictitious creations for themselves. And that other people may agree to believe in these fictions and follow whatever it is they instruct.

Other people may also not agree to believe in these fictions, and not follow whatever it is that they instruct. Which ever the case, it is left for them to agree or to not agree. By agreeing, they clearly have contracted to do so, since contract simply means agreement. By not agreeing, they clearly have not contracted.

An idea that you hold personally as your private fiction, can not obviously be imposed on someone who does not hold to the same idea. Of course, people may agree to be bound by an idea, but that is entirely up to them. They can equally not agree to engage in the business of someone’s idea, and that would be fine too. This agreeing or not agreeing, of course, applies to everyone equally.

To make, threaten, or force someone to agree or to disagree would be to make them into a slave.

Now that we understand that, then this whole idea must be the same for personally owned private countries.

In other words, personally owned private fictitious countries, cannot make rules to force people to agree or to disagree. All individuals, have equal freewill to choose what they agree to for themselves, and they and their individual freewill are to be found in the the territory of the physical world of nature.

Wait a minute !!!! Hmmmm….what has been said here, could all be nonsense.

So the best place to find out, if this is all true, is to go to the people with the experts to know, and read what they say about their countries when they give a legislative definition of their countries in making contractual deals with each other.

It must not be forgotten that these are ‘precise’ legal or legislative terms in these documents, and define who, as countries, the parties to these deals are, and where they are to be found, meaning their territory, so that they do not impose on people’s choice that freewill gives them.

Of course, if having read the definitions, you agree that is ‘where’ you make your income or a living, then fine, go ahead and follow their laws and start paying up for things like taxes for being where a country is said to be found by their governments.

Definition of countries and knowing what they are ‘made up of’ when looking at the word ‘include’ and its different forms to define them –

Note.- Do not forget. What needs to be found are words as symbols that point to ‘real things’, or ‘real nouns’, to be found in the physical world, listed after the word ‘include’, meaning ‘made up of’.

The real nouns listed after the word include (or its differing forms), can only be therefore, those real things listed that will go to ‘make up’ the entire country, nothing else.


Go through the link below systematically and carefully, to learn how to find these definitions. Use common sense and be patient taking the advise of the instructions in the link, if asked to do so.

Once the definitions are found, practice finding them in different countries, states, provinces, etc., websites. Usually the websites of finance ministries or tax authorities, using the search terms,

‘double taxation treaties’ or

‘tax treaty/treaties’ or

‘tax agreement/s’ or

‘double taxation convention’ or

‘tax convention’ or

‘tax information exchange agreements’ (abbreviated to TIEA)

(Follow the instructions and open links to find the legislative definition of a country)



Copy and paste in Google search –

tax treaties + eu

Select the link result –

Treaties for the avoidance of double taxation concluded by …

Choose country to go to, to see that countries website for their accepted and agreed definitions of what they call themselves and where they can be found –

Taxation and Customs Union
Treaties for the avoidance of double taxation concluded by Member States


There are a few exceptions where a country does not provide their legislative-legal definition in their website, but has that definition kept by another organisations website (see Sweden below)



Taxation and Customs Union
Treaties for the avoidance of double taxation concluded by Member States


The Legislative-legal Definition of Greece

7 March 2014
page 937
Convention Between The Hellenic Republic and The Republic of San Marino
Article 3

Article 3


1. b) the term “Hellenic Republic” means the territory of the Hellenic Republic, including territorial sea and national airspace, as well as the maritime areas, over which the Hellenic Republic exercises or shall exercise sovereignty, sovereign rights or jurisdiction in accordance with international law;

4 February 2014
page 458
Agreement Between The Government of the Hellenic Republic and the Government of the United Arab Emirates
Article 3

Article 3


1. b. the term “Hellenic Republic” comprises the territory of the Hellenic Republic including its territorial sea and airspace, as well as the part of the seabed and its subsoil under the Mediterranean Sea, over which the Hellenic Republic in accordance with international law as well as the law of the Hellenic Republic, has sovereign rights for the purpose of exploration, extraction or exploitation of the natural resources of such areas;

15 December 2008
page 4046
Agreement between the Hellenic Republic and the Republic of Austria
Article 3

Article 3


1. b. the term “Hellenic Republic” comprises the territory of the Hellenic Republic, including its territorial sea, as well as the part of the seabed and its subsoil under the Mediterranean Sea, over which the Hellenic Republic, in accordance with international law, has sovereign rights for the purpose of exploration, extraction or exploitation of the natural resources of such areas;

Analysis of Article 3

the term “Hellenic Republic” comprises the territory of the Hellenic Republic including its territorial sea and airspace, as well as the part of the seabed and its subsoil under the Mediterranean Sea, over which the Hellenic Republic in accordance with international law as well as the law of the Hellenic Republic, has sovereign rights for the purpose of exploration, extraction or exploitation of the natural resources of such areas;

“Hellenic Republic” comprises the territory of the Hellenic Republic

– The territory being spoken of comprises that of the imagination as fiction, since the Hellenic Republic is a fiction of the imagination

– A fiction is not capable of possessing physical territory

– The Hellenic Republic being a fiction comprises imaginative territory

– The Hellenic Republic means a fictional territory


– This term, “including”, means, “made up of (entirely)”.

– Following the term, “including”, we expect to read a listing of real things (real nouns) that the country of the Hellenic Republic can only ‘claim’ to have jurisdiction over, which will also mean jurisdiction over those objects to be found residing or admitting of that territory

– All else that follows the term, “including”, amounts to opinion in the nature of fictions, as privately held beliefs

The physical locations that make up the entire territory of the Hellenic Republic are as follows

– airspace

– territorial waters (sea)

– and maritime areas (more sea, as the Exclusive Economic Zone)

– the seabed

– subsoil under the Mediterranean Sea

Via Reference Sourcing:
Ministry of Finance

Secondary Sourcing:

Treaties for the avoidance of double taxation concluded by Member States


Illustration of Claimed Physical Geographic Territories of Countries

The only physical territories countries may ‘claim’ to operate from, in order that ‘their’ constitutional-legislative laws do not interfere with freewill, are therefore those territories where the living are commonly not to be found alive and well –

Soil Layers


See pages 18 – 21
Maritime Zones and Jurisdictions

Internal waters


After reading, “What is Intellectual Property?”, found in the “About IP” (Intellectual Property) menu selection from the World Intellectual Property Organization (wipo) website, go on to discover that the Hellenic Republic is copywritten personally owned private fictitious intellectual property, by simply ‘seeing’ its constitution appear in the wipo database –

About IP (english)

Copywritten Constitution of Greece

In search box type,

“Greece constitution”

Results of search –


NSP – Apr 11, 2015 – Guest: Jeff – [UPDATE: FULL PODCAST]

NSP – Apr 11, 2015 – Guest: Jeff

Marc Stevens Discredits Scott Bales – Chief Justice Arizona Supreme court

Marc Stevens Discredits Scott Bales – Chief Justice Arizona Supreme court

Debra Spinner – Mesa City Attorney Discredited

Debra Spinner – Mesa City Attorney Discredited




* [2] British parliament to look into Prince Charles’s veto power over laws

United Kingdom Constitution

The Constitution of the United Kingdom is not in a single, written document, but is
drawn from statutes, treaties, court judgments, parliamentary constitutional
conventions, and numerous other sources.


When people individually agree, or ‘contract’, to come together to work in each other’s company, by cooperating together towards the aims of achieving ‘someone’s idea’, or, acting out their lives in accordance with someone’s idea, in accepting what that ‘fictional idea’ provides and offers as a service (e.g., legislative-law) for them to use, we have in the preceding words, the definition of a ‘business company’ with the use of the word, company, being an obvious clue, and also with the use of the word cooperating (its other form being, cooperation), being another obvious clue, that can be replaced with a similar sounding word – corporation – providing for the same principles. Both the words, company and corporation, describe what would be a personally owned private business created for fulfiling the aims of achieving its ambitions for its owner or group-owners amounting to a relatively small number of individuals forming that group in relation to the outside world.

Understanding the principles of a business company in the way it has just been defined, shows us that a ‘written instrument’, described as a political charter (constitution), can only be a personally owned private fictitious corporate business (a private business company), offering a broad range of services from which people can make a ‘choice’ from services ‘offered’, so that they can act out their lives within someone’s personally owned private corporate business idea or fiction, through contract.

Political Charters Create Corporate Countries As Fictions

Category:Political charters

Given an understanding of the nature of constitutions, it becomes clear as to why the following can be seen to make sense –

28 U.S. Code § 3002 – Definitions

(15) “United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States.

In the phrase given as, ‘of the United States’, what is the United States ?


(A) a Federal corporation


Given an appreciation of the personally owned private corporate nature of countries, as they should quite rightly be understood, the necessity of the US representatives presence in London to secure agreement with HM Government, with regards to social security arrangements, becomes clearer –

Statutory Instruments 1997 No. 1778 SOCIAL SECURITY – The Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997

* [2] British parliament to look into Prince Charles’s veto power over laws

When taken in their proper ‘full-context’, the informations that are required reading, concerning Prince Charles’ veto powers, can be found under the subtitled heading, SEQUENCE OF DOING BUSINESS USING WRITTEN INSTRUMENTS AS CONTRACTS, to be found part way down the document –



The participants behind the corporate instruments discussed, cannot be criticized as acting improperly when it comes to their personal affairs. Nonetheless, where they maybe open to criticism, will lie with a lack of obvious, open, fair, and clear disclosure, not made available and offered to parties who attach to any of their written instruments through their agencies directly, or attach by means of third parties.

Without full-disclosure being given, and the means closed to people to conduct their personal and private affairs without corporate interference, people become susceptible to the condition of documentary peonage, that is to say, involuntary slavery through documentation; particularly slavery brought on by the use of the bankers lie of economy to pay for artificial debts as taxes, as well as other money confiscatory schemes that confiscate property and the means through which people can make a livelihood for themselves –



* Lawful precedes legal, and therefore the requirements of lawfulness must be met first for legality to proceed.

Of documentary peonage

Definition of Peonage

Peonage is a type of involuntary servitude


Definition of ‘Involuntary Servitude’

Slavery; the condition of an individual who works for another individual against his or her will as a result of force, coercion, or imprisonment, regardless of whether the individual is paid for the labor.

We read –

(6) Involuntary servitude
The term “involuntary servitude” includes a condition of servitude induced by means of—
(A) any scheme, plan, or pattern intended to cause a person to believe that, if the person did not enter into or continue in such condition, that person or another person would suffer serious harm or physical restraint; or
(B) the abuse or threatened abuse of the legal process.

Definition of coercion

The action or practice of persuading someone to do something by using force or threats


There is always an underlying threat of violence if you fail to comply with private corporate government. Their coercion then, lies with this underlying threat of violence and their lack of full disclosure as to the nature of their organisation as being a, personally owned private fictitious coorporation, which failure of disclosure forms the basis with which the conditions of involuntary slavery can be achieved.

Fortunately, whether they know it or not, all public servants, regardless of where they happen to be, or whichever office they happen to occupy, are responsible for their personal actions in and out of office, no matter what position it is they hold. That being said, Ignorance of the law is no excuse when this is understood in the light of –



* Lawful precedes legal, and therefore the requirements of lawfulness must be met first for legality to proceed.


Who Are You Kidding !!!

Supreme court clears way for release of secret Prince Charles letters


Well, what do we have here ?

As for damaging kingship, what does it matter when you personally own a private corporate country. And as will be realised, environmental issues under the rubric of ‘sustainability’, are not to be dismissed or taken lightly as having no serious impact on the lives of people everywhere on the planet.

Who would have thought a little necessary and embarassing controversy as theatre, to lead those a little naive away from the smell of the hunt, would really affect the plans of the High Contracting Powers as a price they accept to convince people that they are in fact helpless and powerless and that the well timed exposure of themselves, is proof that all eyes and attention, of where true power is held, should be diverted away from them. After all, they hold mere meaningless titles, it is to be thought, that stand and are to be taken as the mere curiosity of the traditions of pagentry in times long past, for the gleefull enthrallment of tourists and a reminder of man’s achievements in reason, by quelling reckless power-crazed monarchs, who so good-heartedly gave up their ambitions entitled to them from divinity.

Of note, we must not forget the Self-Ennoblings Ones and their self-validating clergy’s sole purpose ‘to be’, and what those beliefs are that provide for that purpose. Otherwise, why the need to maintain their underlying structures –

Divine Right of Kings

If we consider that all men are ‘equally endowed’ by nature’s Cause with ‘innate freewill’, then the information we find in reading what is said about the Divine Right of Kings, as well as what is said concerning ‘the Church’, is something of a curiosity, since the Will of God, we would reasonably deduce in relation to man, is quite clear when it comes to all men everywhere – who are endowed with ‘an equal measure of freewill before nature’s Cause or nature’s God’, without exception in the realm of the physical world.

The source of a rebellion to what man sees as God’s Will, on the matter of freewill, would not be God as the source of rebellion contradicting Himself; we would reasonably deduce regarding ‘equal freewill’ in all men, but the source of rebellion, if we look to Heaven for heavenly authority and the source of what God would not make absurd in us, would then be an alternative to God’s Authority and the use by men of that ‘alternative authority’, in making ‘absurd’, equal innate freewill endowed by nature’s Cause or nature’s God in all men.


The High Acting Wizards, As Magicians, Behind The Authorship Of Political Charters On Behalf Of The Self-Ennobling One’s And Their Self-Validating Clergy, Are The Scribes –

Aspirations for the 800th Anniversary

Magna Carta and the US Constitution

The Legal 500

Magic Circle (law)

Taking the magic abroad




Taxation and Customs Union
Treaties for the avoidance of double taxation concluded by Member States

Sweden – Constitution of Sweden


We can see that Sweden has Tax Treaties with other countries –

Sweden’s tax treaties with other countries

Extracting, or getting hold of the details in the Tax Treaties to find the legislative definition of Sweden from swedish sources, we find is not so straight forward. At best, we are left with suggestions of treaties and nothing else that amounts to the definition we seek –

Double Taxation Agreements

Finally, some progress is made when we read –

OECD Model Tax Convention

Here, we find a body, the Council of Europe, recently in the popular news in relation to events in Ukraine. It is not unreasonable to ask, whether they are a representative body that draws-up ‘written instruments as intellectual property’ on behalf of the property Owners to those ‘creations of the mind’, penned as ‘written instruments or political charters’ commonly known as constitutions –


We go on to read concerning the cooperation between the Council of Europe and the OECD –

Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters

In this webpage as well as from the hyperlinks given as, TIEAs signed by Jurisdiction and Also see TIEAs signed by individual jurisdiction, in the same webpage, Sweden makes an appearance –

Tax Information Exchange Agreements (TIEAs)

TIEAs signed by Jurisdiction -Exchange of Tax Information Agreements

TIEAs signed by individual jurisdiction – Recent Tax Information Exchange Agreements

Finally, when the hyper-links are opened in the web-page, the definition for Sweden as the Kingdom of Sweden, is to be found generally within Article 3 or Article 4 under the term, Definition –

* Tax Information Exchange Agreements (TIEAs): Sweden

Note. The definition for the Kingdom of Sweden, conforms with the explanation given as common sense principles, for thinking about countries in relation to freewilled individuals, found in the alphabetically listed, SEQUENCE OF DOING BUSINESS USING WRITTEN INSTRUMENTS AS CONTRACTS, given as b) and i) –

b) Political Charters Create Corporate Countries As Fictions

(Follow the instructions and open links to find the legislative definition of a country)



Defanging the snake

Money Creation –





Skip child support. Go to jail. Lose job. Repeat.

No genuine solutions to be found here –

Greece orders raid on government coffers as cash dwindles
Government issues emergency decree forcing all state bodies to transfer funds to the central bank

Stunned Greeks React To Initial Capital Controls And The “Decree To Confiscate Reserves”, And They Are Not Happy


Europe’s debt mountain just got bigger

Learning to understand what you’re not being told, can be read under the subtitle heading of,


to be found part way down the document –



“He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would fully suffice. This disgrace to civilization should be done away with at once. Heroism at command, senseless brutality, deplorable love-of-country stance, how violently I hate all this, how despicable and ignoble war is; I would rather be torn to shreds than be a part of so base an action! It is my conviction that killing under the cloak of war is nothing but an act of murder. ” — Albert Einstein

Low protection flu vaccine warning

Italy bans Novartis flu vaccine after suspicious deaths

Diseases In The Vaccinated

This website is provided to demonstrate the dangers of vaccination without exception, although the site does suggest some vaccines are necessary. This clearly has never been true –


Schoolgirl who thought she had flu cannot move arms or legs and can barely talk – and doctors do not know what is wrong with her

Google search –

vaccine induced encephalitis


And of course, given the clear historic record that continues to this day, scientists then and now, are simply introducing further blood contaminants for us to naively believe that they are genuinely trying to benefit mankind by claiming to have solutions to counter the previous health destroying contaminants, that have created an epidemic in health related problems in the first place, with us having to trust them and the good they say their snake-oil pharmaceutical-chemical poisonous cocktails will do to us –

Pioneering trials using man-made DNA begin in battle against cancer, ebola, flu and HIV with scientists saying the treatment could be the key to defeating them

Australian PM On Vaccines, ‘No Jab, No Pay’

Brain-Damaged Victims of Swine Flu Vaccine Win $63 Million Lawsuit
GSK has paid out $9.1 billion since 2003

Brain-Damaged Victims of Swine Flu Vaccine Win $63 Million Lawsuit

Further Reference Material:



Dzhokhar Tsarnaev: Boston Marathon bomber found guilty

Hollywood producer Nathan Folks Blows The Whistle On Boston Bombing FALSE FLAG

Minneapolis police records shed light on 2014 military training


How the Global Warming Scare Began

Dr Don Easterbrook Exposes Climate Change Hoax

Food Chain Catastrophe: Emergency Shut Down Of West Coast Fisheries: “Populations Have Crashed 91 Percent”


Don’t believe the economic hype – this is a bubble, not a boom

UK reliance on loans and credit cards puts recovery at risk, IMF warns


Taking away your freewill by taking away your ability, as and when you wish, to represent your livelihood in exchanges, for instead, banking slavery and its nonsensical reasonings –

Citibank: It’s Time to Ban Cash

Do not be distracted and misled away from this –



Former IMF President, Bank-Bailout-Fiasco President, and VP of Spain, Long Untouchable by the Law – Suddenly Gets Crushed

Former IMF President, Bank-Bailout-Fiasco President, and VP of Spain, Long Untouchable by the Law – Suddenly Gets Crushed

Balkan Anti-imperialist Movement – Central banking elite met today behind closed doors

Central banking elite met today behind closed doors

Central banking elite met today behind closed doors

Gold, the renminbi and the multi-currency reserve system (2013), PDF

World Gold Council – Who We Are

* World Gold Council – Our Members

Why Gold is as valuable as a lump of lead –




US Embassy in Manila: Controversy over Spratly Islands territorial

China Building Aircraft Runway in Disputed Spratly Islands

US troops in Ukraine to train forces fighting pro-Russia rebels

300 US troops in Ukraine to train Ukrainian forces: US Army

US preparing for ground offensive in Ukraine: ex-Kremlin advisor

A U.S.-Russia War Over Ukraine?


The wrong reasons given for the right question to ask

Think world financial crisis and irreversible world economic collapse, and you have the reasons for the Self-Ennobling Ones, their self-validating clergy, and their bankers, having long ago prepared for war, with the helpful assistance of their executive management of each of the Self-Ennobling Ones copywritten personally owned private fictitious corporate countries


The prelude to war can be traced as far back as 2008, when we look at the information under the subtitle heading,


to be found down part way down the document –



* Africa is not “poor,” it’s being looted
Africa is not “poor,” it’s being looted

Overpopulation Is A Myth

‘Rockefeller and Stanford globalist think-tanks came up with the concept of ethnic cleansing by way of prolonged infection so that the target and cause could not be correlated. Biologicals and chemicals provide this covert mass extermination’ …

1962, the US Senate received a report concerning chemical and biological warfare


Search for pdf book –

The Molecular Vision of Life: Caltech, The Rockefeller Foundation, and the Rise of the New Biology (Oxford University Press, 1993)


The Rockfeller Foundation’s Molecular Vision of Life — How the Aims of Eugenics, Social Control, and Human Engineering Shaped Molecular Biology and 20th Century Science –
A Review of Lily E. Kay’s The Molecular Vision of Life: Caltech, The Rockefeller Foundation, and the Rise of the New Biology (Oxford University Press, 1993)


And of course, like everywhere else, they want it all –

The TRUE size of Africa
The TRUE size of Africa

DoD quietly expanding AFRICOM missions

US AFRICOM Commander Calls for “Huge” Military Campaign in West Africa

And in wanting it all, that is why there is also a need for this –

PATH – Driving Transformative Innovation To Save Lives

Vaccine introduction strategy – Two-pronged approach includes mass vaccination and integration into existing programs

Meningitis Vaccine Project – Eliminating epidemic meningitis as a public health problem in sub-Saharan Africa

* Exposed! Ebola Outbreak In Africa Coincides with Massive CDC ‘Meningitis Vaccine Campaign’

World Health Organization (WHO)
Meningitis vaccination campaign to reach 300 million by 2016

US Exploiting West Africa Ebola Outbreak to Establish Military Foothold

* Horrors of Vaccination Exposed




Episode 286 – Rockefeller Medicine

Episode 286 – Rockefeller Medicine


Aside from the ‘misguided’ explanations provided for by the far too many authors misrepresenting money and economy, exemplified by G. Edward Griffin, Ellen Hodgson Brown and Bill Still, with the only exceptions being that of Mike Montagne and David Ardron’s often plagiarized discovery of the bankers lie of economy and its resolution through Mathematically Perfected Economy, for which plagiarized work is set about for the deliberate sole-purpose of distorting the truth, it should come as no surprise, once the bankers lie of economy is understood, that the Rockefeller Foundation was able to monopolize the medical industry from its very inception, in education and teaching, all the way through to hospitals and the pharmaceutical-chemical prescriptions of medications, when we consider the princely sum of $100,000,000 (100 million dollars), as far back as ‘1913’, that the esteemed John D. Rockefeller himself, ‘gifted’ the Foundation with, no doubt having the means to be able to do this, given his success in business, particularly what would become his inter-connecting family banking ties with other private banking dynasties of Europe, who long since were and are still able to accumulate vast sums of confiscated wealth through the bankers lie of economy, on behalf the Self-Ennobling Ones, and their self-validating clergy, to influence the world in every manner imaginable with their private world-wide network of central banks operating as a single system headed by the Bank of Inernational Settlements, to be found in all the personally owned private fictitious corporate countries both of which do not provide for obvious, fair, clear and full disclosure as to the nature of their character and operations –


Political Charters Create Corporate Countries As Fictions

The Rockefeller Foundation’s Charter with an account of the extra contributory ‘gift’ of 100 million dollars given by John D. Rockefeller under the title of, FUNDS RECEIVED, on page 10 –

Charter of Rockefeller Foundation 1913.pdf (PDFy mirror)



To find out what the ‘1913’ $100,000,000 price tag amounts to in todays dollar equivalent, enter 100000000.00 in the purchase amount value field –

Inflation Calculator

At the time of publication with a cumulative rate of inflation of 2270.9 percent, (1913) $100,000,000 = (2015) $2,370,929,292.93

Subject: Info on the FED, Rockefeller Shadow Government –

Charts in Text Format of Interlocking Directorships and Family Linkages taken from “Federal Reserve Directors: A Study of Corporate and Banking Influence. Staff Report, Committee on Banking, Currency and Housing, House of Representatives, 94th Congress, 2nd Session, August 1976.”


Who Is Running America?

The Bankruptcy of America, the Corporate United States, and the New World Order



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s