Mike Montagne together with David Ardron, to their credit, have provided the true means for all of us to understand how the bankers lie of economy really works and the one and one only solution as a prescription to its ceasless destruction, which at the same time provides for True Economy to be implemented with virtually no cost, for a complete and immediate reversal of our economic misfortunes.

There can be only one solution to the bankers lie of economy that provides for True Economy, and you can be sure that the bankers and their proxies are making every effort to ensure you never find out what it is.

The remarkable efforts to ignore, distort, misrepresent and discredit Mathematically Perfected Economy are a testament to its enduring truth.

You’ll realise why it is Mathematically Perfected Economy is never touched on by your ‘trusted and faithful’ providers of information.

Needless to say, they all seem to be on your side, but whatever happens, even if it takes telling the truth about our plight with regards to the bankers and their plans to impoverish us, you as sheep must never know or even come close to hearing of Mathematically Perfected Economy.

With the preceding in mind, it is a heart-warming pleasure to publish a message received from David Ardron of –

Australia for Mathematically Perfected Economy

It is only left to say, as a matter of concern, that you would be your own worst fools to ignore Mathematically Perfected Economy and not spend every waking hour presenting it ‘as far afield’ as possible.





It is true there is no debt owed to any bank, however this is not to infer there is no debt we have between ourselves for this otherwise unexploited debt is merely an exchange of our labour & production, redeeming money for property, where there are no loans or borrowing.

The key to comprehending true debt is to know what money actually is, what it truly represents & how its truly created. Money is therefore a debt instrument, not a debt itself, simply because the exchange or the act of redeeming money for property & or services is the only true debt, money is therefore a record of entitlement that one may receive on the exchange or trans/action that merely evidences what value we have given up to each other, thereafter upon fulfillment of a debt or trans/action money is most certainly not a debt but a record of earned entitlement that can be spent elsewhere in the course of redeeming another’s production & finally money is created by our promissory obligations we have to each other, which is only a promise to pay an otherwise *unexploited obligation*, with one’s own *labour and production*, for what one consumes of another’s *labour and production*… where again, there are no loans, no borrowing, & only as a result, likewise is there no interest.

It is true there has never been any lending or borrowing since the conception of banking so why would you or I propose anything else but to rectify today’s falsified debt ( falsified debt = theft ) that merely pretends to loan money, into what a debt aught to rightly be?

Most people fail to even comprehend the only real intrinsic value is what money actually represents, evidences & records upon the exchange, promissory obligation ( money creation ) inclusive, that’s in short the value of the labour & production we give up to each other, which is logically a principal debt where there are no loans or borrowing.

However I must stress, ever since the conception of banking, all banks, no exceptions, have falsified this otherwise unexploited debt to themselves by unjust intervention on the exchange, contract / promissory obligation, pretending ,then, to risk or give up value of their own in the exchange, contract / promissory obligation. either in banks publication, purported creation of money, or any purported loan the bank may impose on one of us as a result.

So to conclude what I have written here is to not infer there is no debt because there actually is a debt between ourselves & deny this debt is to deny a theft due to the banks unjust intervention or purposed obfuscation of our promissory obligations we have to each other, which in turn allows banks / money changers to steal the true value of what is given up in the otherwise unexploited debt ” X2 ” because of unwarranted interest only as if the bank risked or gave up consideration of value of their own in the exchange, so it would be even incorrect to assume one is not paying interest if they haven’t a falsified debt or purported loan from a bank simply because all the principal & interest all industry & commerce pays to banks is logically passed on to the consumer in the resulting price of goods & services, thus the added cost of interest above the initial cost of principal is the very cause of most if not all price inflation today, artificial in nature, since the very conception of banking, giving one only the illusion rising prices means rising value when the true value of all money & property or the value of our labour & production we give up to each other in any exchange or trans/action is being stolen by banking only to be borrowed back as perpetual re-inflation or irreversible multiplications of artificial debt, federal /state debt, so its physically possible for at least some of us to earn principal & interest out of a circulation consisting of some remaining principal at most to actually service the former sum of artificial debt, until such time, upon terminal cycles of dispossession everyone will be dispossessed of all their property & wealth one by one in the very end, & believe it or not all this is simply done by a bank pretending to loan value it neither risks or gives up in any exchange or in an otherwise unexploited debt.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™



– Corliss Lamont

“Political language … is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.” – George Orwell

“The greatest threat to our world and its peace comes from those who want war, who prepare for it, and who, by holding out vague promises of future peace or by instilling fear of foreign aggression, try to make us accomplices to their plans. — Hermann Hesse – Author (1877-1962)






Grammar explains the way in which language is used by people.

For time immemorial, every single man, woman and child had uttered in recognition, prayer as tribute to nature’s God, without having a care in the world to think that they were doing so.

We come to know, that in explaining the way in which we use words as symbols in language, or as parts of speech, for representing the –

‘things in existence and the changes they undergo’,

and that are not of our imagination – grammatically ‘the things in existence’ are known as Real Nouns and ‘the changes they undergo’ are symbolised with words known as Verbs.

Those things belonging to our imaginings are recognised as such, and are called Fictional or Fictitious Nouns.

People as real things, are further categorised as nouns into – persons. The title or label of persons, may also be shared with the fictitious things derived from our imaginings, and as such, are also therefore termed Fictitious nouns.

The distinction as to which is meant, real or fictitious, is a matter of jurisdiction. Jurisdiction ‘is control’ over ‘where’ objects or bodies are to be found.

‘Where’ denotes territory, and therefore, jurisdiction is to be considered jurisdiction (control) over bodies to be found in a territory – Territorial Jurisdiction.

Those things that are real, reside in or inhabit the physical world, where they are to be found to be regulated or controlled by that worlds natural influences or laws. As such, those bodies that come under the influences of those natural laws, are described as being found to be present under a Natural Law Territorial Jurisdiction, or control, in that physical world.

People are real, and inhabit the territory of the physical world, and the natural influences on them in that world regulates their behaviour. The natural influence or law that is to be found ‘in’ people, and that regulates or controls the behaviour of people in equal measure everywhere, in the ‘territory of the physical world’, is the law of Freewill.

Great care then, must be taken in deciding or agreeing to ‘where’ you are to be found, because the jurisdiction or control over where you are to be found may not be to your liking.

Those things that are fictitious, for example corporations, are simply figments of someone’s imagination to be written-down as their Creator or Owner so chooses.

Therefore, fictitious nouns reside in or inhabit an imaginary jurisdictional territory and accord to ‘Personal Opinion As Laws’ in line with their Owners wishes, whose imagination created them.

At the very least these ‘Personal Opinions As Law’, ought not to be in conflict with their Owners wishes and interests, if these fictitious nouns are left in the care of others.


A noun therefore is the name of a person, thing, or place, which when, those natural things symbolised or indicated by the use of nouns are decerned through our five senses, they are said to be real, and those things when discerned by our mind, or the feelings or sensations of the mind alone, are said to be the fictitious imaginings of someone’s mind.

Things in existence are recognised as real by the use of our senses. And the parts of speech that regards them are called Real Nouns.

People are real things, and the words and synonyms used to indicate and describe people, are nouns or the names of persons that form the parts of speech that regard them.

For a lot of people, what can become difficult to understand, or what can be confusing, is why those ‘things’ described as nouns can alter their nature and become somehow in themselves, ‘characteristic of action’ or have the qualities that make-up action, when we take the verb – to be.

The verb To Be, shows existence of a things condition as it ‘is’, or as we find it, and without the thing necessarily being ‘in action’ through its own self-efforts by acting on itself.

This then means that the thing can be considered as, somehow, both a noun and a verb without it having to do anything.

The question that arises is, why should this be the case ?


Personal Pronouns and The Verb – To Be

Personal Pronouns (in place of the name of a person) & The Verb – To Be

I am

You are

He is
She is
It is

We are
You are
They are

– Personal pronouns and the verb to be, show existence of a thing through association with action and without the necessity of the thing having to perform action or act in some way.



The verb To Be in antiquity was understood to have very special significance that was attributed to its Holy or Divine nature. Those in antiquity understood that on asking nature’s Cause or nature’s God His name or who He is, God replied –


This signified that He was the supernatural Cause, the alpha and omega, of bringing existence or the physical world into being, and the Cause of taking existence or the physical world out of being.

As the Cause, His actions created what are His effects or His existence – existence belonging to Him. Existence are His Actions, His effects, of which He is the Cause.

Those in antiquity recognised that through His eyes, we could only be considered as God’s actions, His verbs, if we were to explain them grammatically in the use of speech when communicating to each other.

His actions, that ‘are existence’ or the things that make-up existence, were understood to be in fact an act of God’s actions – God’s verbs.

It was understood that this ‘is’ the order provided to us and ‘to be found within us’ as God’s order, by recognising natures’s Cause or nature’s God providing for existence, through man’s use of words in language that made up the verb – To Be.

It would then be said that we utter, as prayer everyday, recognition of our existence as God’s actions belonging to God, through the use of the verb To Be – He brought things into being, into action; He brought about all things ‘To Be’, to act.

The order then, ‘to be found within us’, that people recognised as also coming from God, and that they recognised everyone had in equal measure, as something endowed to them by God, and which was deduced using the objectivity of – ‘without fear, favour, or prejudice’ – that is to say God’s love, was understood to belong to God, as God’s effect of Free-will.

Free-will having been recognised to belong to the supernatural Cause that is God, was said to then have a supranatural quality that we had been all endowed with equally, and that indeed formed the only true law provided to us by God – the Law of Freewill.

In this way it was ensured that all understood that –

there can be no slavery,

and none could claim otherwise, with fear, favour, or prejudice above another, acting as a conduit to tribute.


Definitions of –


(of a manifestation or event) attributed to some force beyond scientific understanding or the laws of nature


Note. Supranatural can be seen as having the power or influence to transcend all other agencies which are of similar character to fictions.
Supranatural Law is then – the Law of Freewill

having power or influence that transcends national boundaries or governments


3. A means by which something is transmitted


a. A payment or tax given by a feudal vassal to an overlord.
b. The obligation to make such a payment.


2. A bondman; a slave




Nature’s Cause or nature’s God endows everyone, in equal measure, with the gift of Free-will.

We have each been endowed with Free-will in equal measure, and that provides for us the prerogative given to us by nature’s Cause or nature’s God, to agree or not to agree. To contract or not to contract. This is our Personal Jurisdiction to be found in the physical world, given to us by nature’s Cause or Nature’s God that may not be encroached on by another.

Free-will can then be readily seen as our natural right, with which we all have been endowed, and which is to be found in the territorial jurisdiction of the physical world, that belongs to nature’s Cause or nature’s God.

Free-will’s operations comes to us from nature’s Cause or Nature’s God into the natural world where we reside, as the jurisdiction or authority provided for by nature’s Cause or nature’s God, that is of course natural and, therefore, to be known as Natural Law.

In so far as we have not caused harm or injury to another, nor damaged another’s property, and that we have ensured that we do not behave in a reckless manner as to risk injury to another’s well-being, then none in the natural world, regardless of the authority represented, or the authority held, or the agencies from which authority is said to derive, may impose their wishes.

Prayer to nature’s Cause or nature’s God is natural religion, and it is the purpose of religion to recognise the act of love that nature’s Cause or nature’s God has created in bringing about existence, real things, or reality, of which Freewill is a part.

The jurisdictional or controlling authority for bodies with freewill in the physical world lies, not with ‘the traditions of man’ but, with the Supernatural Authority that provides the law man must not transgress through intuitively knowing of it. That law and the only true law that applies to those in the territorial jurisdiction of the physical world is –

The Law of Freewill,

which provides for people to freely do as they so choose, insofar as they do not cause injury to others or their property and that they do not behave recklessly at the risk of causing injury to the well-being of others and their property. This is what is to be defended.

To the extent that prayer that pays tribute to nature’s Cause, or nature’s God, freely chooses nature’s Cause or nature’s God, as the only Authority of control over the territorial jurisdiction of the physical world, Whose law as authority for that world is to be found in Free-will, then there can be no other laws as ‘opinions’ that ought to be sanctified, particularly if they are derived from imaginings that are of a fictitious nature, examples of which are mere ‘claims’ to authority that anyone can freely choose as ‘their’ authority to pay tribute to, if they so wish.

However, history shows that the ‘traditions of men’ are not necessarily to one’s advantage or to the advantage of one’s progenies, as ‘authority’ can be somewhat temperamental, and tend towards exploitation and tyranny.


sanctify –
give official acceptance or approval to (something)

temperamental –
unpredictable in behavior or performance

progenies –
1 a : descendants, children
b : offspring of animals or plants




What at the very least must be understood, is that man may not claim territorial jurisdiction over other men who dwell in the physical world. There can be no slavery in a world subject to the jurisdictional authority of Natural Law given by nature’s Cause or nature’s God, as Free-will in man.

Free-will is man’s nature and anything that ‘imposes’ on that Free-will amounts to slavery.

Those who wish no imposition, may if they so choose, build a fictional system for cooperation/corporation, or working together, that is derived from their imaginings, which must have its claims to territorial jurisdiction ‘where’ others do not ordinarily dwell, transverse or benefit from, and to which men may freely choose to be a part of, or if they no longer find it to their benefit, freely choose to leave without protestation of something that is not theirs to protest against. It must be remembered that there can be no slavery as a consequence of Free-will.

Free-will is man’s make-up, it is the way he is made, he is made to have Free-will. It is natural.

Our Personal Contract with nature’s Cause is understood to mean that we have The Authority of Freewill to do as we freely choose, in so far as we cause no harm or injury to others and their property, nor behave in a reckless manner as to risk causing injury to the well-being of others.

It is for each and everyone of us to decide to choose whether or not we ‘restrict’ our rights that Free-will provides for us in our lives. There can be no slavery or its imposition. Freewill and the rights of choice it provides for a ‘freeman’ are the law. By this, it is to be understood that your choice is the law. Your choice is what you decide to agree to or contract to. In this way, for all of us – contract is the law and tyranny is defended against.

To belabour through the point once more because of its immense significance and importance, it is reasonable to see that in the jurisdiction of the physical world where natural law is to be found, none may impose their will. The law is then freewill. Freewill is lawful. Imposition against freewill would be unlawful, that is to say, against nature’s Cause or nature’s God.

There can be no slavery unless we delude ourselves into consenting to become slaves outside of the jurisdictional territories of the physical world and the authority that controls it and applies to it – that is, Natural Law as Free-will in man, and in which jurisdictional authority we are all naturally under and from which our freedoms with respect to each other are maintained.

In choosing to be a guest in someone else’s home or jurisdiction, then quite naturally you are to comply to his rules. Nevertheless, if you tire or feel as a host that he is not hospitable, then you are free to leave his home or jurisdiction. If you find that your host will not permit you to leave or at the very least makes it difficult for you to leave, then you are within your rights to defend yourself. Freewill is the law and will forever be lawful.

Those who wish to be held by ‘the traditions of men’ for a limited time may freely do so, and those who choose to be held by nature’s Cause or nature’s God may equally do so.

In so far as ‘the traditions of men’ are understood, history observes that they may be somewhat intemperate in contrast to nature’s Cause or nature’s God that provides for immutable laws.

In this regard, choose carefully to which jurisdictional laws you would be held to and made to answer for.

As for atheists, agnostics, humanists and other progressives and their certainties in the reasonings of men – well, good luck with having a bases to defend yourselves with.


Tyranny is the absence of freewill that maybe arrived at through the threat of violence, violence or psychological means




It must be remembered that when charters talk of freedom, within those very same charters, they may state the obvious. However, as personal and therefore private instruments of those who created them, joining or contracting to them, effectively restricts the freedoms of anyone doing so. Whether this is seen as admirable, is for the individual to decide –

Page 2 of ‘Charters of our freedom’, Chapter 1 The Nature of Freedom, we read from a fragment of the Magna Carta (Charter),

“Know ye that we by this our present Charter No freeman shall be seized…”

What is worth thinking about, is that a freeman is a freeman because he has no restrictions placed on his freewill in conformity with Natural Law, in so far as he does not cause injury to others and their property, and that he avoids reckless behaviour at the risk of causing injury or disruption to the well-being of others.

Once a freeman becomes party to a charter, through an oath of allegiance or otherwise, his freedoms in conformity to freewill bestowed by Natural Law are restricted. It is for those who are party to a charter, to ensure that the restrictions placed on them by a charter do not extend to ‘freemen’.

Charters of our freedom ([n.d.])

Note. It would be more than a very good idea, not only to read the information at the top of the web-page that the link for the ‘QUICK LINK GUIDE FOR RAPID UNDERSTANDING OF LIBERTY’ has to reveal, but to reflect on what is presented by it when in contemplation regarding this –
Europe has stolen the rights we won at Magna Carta. Let’s fight to reclaim them



MAGNA CARTA – The Formal Beginning of the Incorporation of the United Kingdom (amendments to which document, the documents owners and their assigns are entitled to make at any time in the future, insofar as they do not extend their reach into – The Territorial Jurisdiction of the Physical World)

Note. Numbered Clause 39, reads –

+ (39) No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his
rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his
standing in any other way, nor will we proceed with force against
him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgement of his
equals or by the law of the land.


Note. It is irrelevant that the international bankers are jews or gentiles. What is of interest, is the age old mechanism and organisation that the central bankers or international bankers employ to their advantage. When it comes to who is behind the exploitation of people, then a clear long look in the mirror provides for a very good answer. Only naive children are expected to put their lives in the hands of people they do not really know without any consideration for whether or not they present a danger, regardless of the offerings they ‘claim’ to make. Our lives are our own, and as adults we do not look to others to take responsibility for our lives, we look to ourselves. Understanding Jurisdiction and True Economy prescribed as Mathematically Perfected Economy, go a long way in helping us to take responsibility for our lives –

For Educational Purposes Only
Illuminati Banker Unveiled Method of Control

Geneva versus Peace, pdf

Note. This is horrendous news in light of what Mathematically Perfected Economy shows –
Bob Diamond reveals banking plan for Africa

Note. Know the truth of economy through Mathematically Perfected Economy –
Currency crisis at Chinese banks ‘could trigger global meltdown’

State crime labs are incentivized to get false convictions

Note. For educational purposes only –
52. For what are the international bankers waiting if the nation is

QUOTE by an attorney: “But the bankers said it is not expedient at this time (i.e.,
1980s) to admit that they own everything and could foreclose on every nation of the
world. The reason they don’t want to tell everyone that they own everything is that
there are still too many privately owned guns. There are uncooperative armies and
other military forces. So until they can gradually consolidate all armies into a World
Army and all courts into a single World Court, it is not expedient to admit the
jurisdiction the courts are operating under…” [UCC Connection, by Howard
Freeman, page 5]

The Kings, Popes and Parasites in Early American History

Archived copy:

Alternative site copy:

Definition of expedient

* The Divine Right of Kings


Board of Trade (The Committee of Privy Council for Trade and Foreign Plantations)

British committees, commissions, and councils of trade and plantations, 1622-1675 (1908)

World Book Encyclopedia

The World Book Encyclopedia Volume 12 (1917)

Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition


Google Search Terms –

* high contracting parties to the grand alliance

* the holy alliance

* the treaty of verona (secret treaty of Verona of November 22, 1822)


Extract from the 1916 Congressional Record Senate – SECRET TREATY OF VERONA

The Treaty of Peace between the Allied Powers and Germany

Holy Alliance

Definition of high contracting parties

Extract from the 1916 Congressional Record Senate – SECRET TREATY OF VERONA

The Treaty of Peace between the Allied Powers and Germany

Hague Trust Convention


Consider, men maybe drawn and driven to give up their God given personal jurisdiction for that of seemingly distinct separate fictional ones, and with the passage of time and patience, for that of a single fictional controlling one, through the arrangement of carefully planned ageless strifes and wars in their lives. For this purpose the lie of banking may have been devised to assist in this aim.




Note. Constant, ceaseless and accelerating deflation or shrinking of the money supply is the norm with the bankers lie of economy until the inevitable termination of an economy by it –
Biggest fall in business lending in six months

Anthony Migchels Exposed

Call to scrap deposit guarantees

“Leave! We don’t want the f***n government … Go back to where you came from bastards!” Mexican vigilantes kick military out of their town after the military murdered four people including an eleven year old girl.

Hard times? Spain’s elite richer than ever

EU-Zoned Out: Latvian skilled workers leave country amid poor social policies

Sheeple: Why You Should Feel Sorry For Them

We Need to Talk About the Sheeple

China’s SMEs face severe cash crunch
June 9, 2011

The Fix for China’s Small-Business Cash Crunch
July 31, 2013

China Cash Crunch Shows Central Bank’s Difficulties
Dec. 23, 2013

Cash crunch exposes the struggle for finance
December 29, 2013

How have the recent cash crunch debacle impact Chinese corporations in terms of their daily financing needs?
December 30, 2013

Pimco Sees Dim Sum Refinancing Boom on Cash Crunch
Jan 2, 2014

Europe crisis, China slowdown & slow US recovery: India faces litmus test in 2014
Jan 5, 2014

George Soros warns that Chinese slowdown is biggest worry in 2014
5 January 2014

Analysis: Cash crunch signals policy dilemma for China’s reformist central bank
Jan 6, 2014

Crunch Escalates as Money Funds Rival Shadow Banks: China Credit
Jan 19, 2014


The $23 Trillion Credit Bubble In China Is Starting To Collapse – Global Financial Crisis Next?


The Influenza Deception

Well, well … what have we here –
Our government system is broken and requires revolutionary change

Note. With regards to the links below on the movement of the French comdeian Dieudonné, the question to ask and that needs to be answered is –
‘where’ does the UK governments jurisdiction, as well as the EU’s jurisdiction, exist.
Once that is made clear, then those bodies outside of their jurisdiction, would not be within the controlling authority of their fictional corporate laws, which would then expose them for what they are. Just somebody’s personal policy. There can be no slavery or tyranny outside of the territorial jurisdiction of private fictional corporate entities.
To understand where governments authority, or the authority of any other private fictional corporate entity is to be found, material under the heading JURISDICTION may enlighten us to this question when we read –


Dieudonné M’bala M’bala: French ‘quenelle’ comedian banned from UK

Should Dieudonné have been banned from entering Britain?

The law isn’t there to protect us from Dieudonné’s odious views




– Criss Angel

Ah, yes, superstition: it would appear to be cowardice in face of the supernatural.
– Theophrastus

Conscience without judgment is superstition.
– Benjamin Whichcote

A superstition which pretends to be scientific creates a much greater confusion of thought than one which contents itself with simple popular practices.
– Johan Huizinga

In the absence of evidence, superstition. It’s a Middle Ages thing. That’s my theory anyway.
– Tucker Carlson

The root of all superstition is that men observe when a thing hits, but not when it misses.
– Francis Bacon

The only foes that threaten America are the enemies at home, and these are ignorance, superstition and incompetence.
– Elbert Hubbard

Superstitions, Myths, Folklore and Gold



Strange that men would believe that a lump of metal possesses magic qualities. Magic is the tool to convince the ‘base idiocy’ to be found in all men to have them loosen the grip on their faculties. Those that know of this hidden truth, control the destiny of the world.




IMF adds four European countries to financial risk list
Mon Jan 13, 2014

(Reuters) – The IMF on Monday added Denmark, Finland, Norway and Poland to its list of countries that must have regular check-ups of their financial sectors, under an effort to prevent a repeat of the global financial crisis.

Definitions of Voodoo

Definition of Necromancy

Definition of Supernatural







Note. Branding the cattle –
UK schools fingerprinted over 800k kids, third without parents’ consent

Millions of children to be fingerprinted

Definition of Brand




Red-Symphony – Global Enslavement using Usury-Capitalism and Communism

Page 30 –

R: Every masonic organization tries to attain and to create all
the required prerequisites for the triumph of the Communist revolution ;
this is the obvious aim of freemasonry; it is clear that all this is done
under various pretexts ; but they always conceal themselves behind their
well-known treble slogan . (Liberty, Equality, Fratemity-Transl .) You
understand? But since the Communist ‘revolution’ has in mind the
liquidation, as a class, of the whole bourgeoisie, the physical destruction
of all bourgeois political rulers,’ it follows that the real secret of masonry
-is the suicide of freemasonry as an organization, and the physical
suicide of every more important mason . You can, of course, understand
that such an end, which is being prepared for every mason, fully
deserves the secrecy, decorativeness and the inclusion of yet another
whole series of secrets, with a view to concealing the real one . If one
day you were to be present at some future revolution then do not miss
the opportunity of observing the gestures of surprise and the expression
of stupidity on the face of some freemason at the moment when he
realises that he must die at the hands of the revolutionaries . How he
screams and wants that one should value his services to the revolution!
It is a sight at which one can die . . . but of laughter .

Forward, page 1 –
The translator’s own book on “The Struggle for World Power” also deals with the whole problem of super-power and global enslavement through the masters of both usury-Capitalism and terroristic Communism, which are both the tools of the same forces and serving the same purpose.

foreward, page 1 –
In the present work we see this whole story brilliantly described and proved by one of the major exponents of the subversive take-over of the world, Christian G. Rakovsky, one of the founders of Soviet Bolshevism and also a victim of the show trials . just before the last war under Stalin.




Brief Introduction

Police officers have a difficult job to do. They can’t be all things to all people. Their job is made even more difficult when they are not made aware of what law truly revolves around. Theirs then, can become an occupation that serves the interests of a small minority, rather then serving the interests of justice and the law, to which we are all entitled. In a similar manner, those of us who are not police officers, ought also to know what the law revolves around, and it certainly isn’t the privilege of having our own personal self-interests exclusively served. We are all subject to ‘the law’, and those with any aspirations to maturity will try to understand why that is. In short, we can’t have bullying or slavery running rampant in our communities, which ultimately will only play into the hands of the international bankers and their proxies for them to use disorder as an excuse to convince others that darconian measures are needed to prevent crime. Those ‘law-abiding citizens’ will of course be in full agreement, without realising that the ultimate aim of those draconian laws would be directed at them, the educated populace, as the only true threat standing in the way of tyranny.

Understandably, we all share a strong sense of loyalty to those we are closest to. Those we share our lives with everyday. This is where for all of us, the temptation of closing-ranks is at its highest, and where justice and law find themselves at the mercy of, not the truth, but of the delusion of minority self-interests. Self-interests hold to their own sway. Self-interests only regard justice and the law as ‘tools’ that serve their idea of what’s right, and of course that privilege of knowing what’s right would be exclusively theirs to make. This is more so true, when without being conscious of it, all of us including the police, are ‘used as tools’ to further the aims of abolishing the law. It cannot be denied that each and everyone of us have fallen into this trap. And the great majority of us are unaware of it.

All of us are deluding ourselves into thinking of each other as, somehow, the enemy. To help us see how this is being done, all we need do is stand outside ‘the fish-bowl’ where our lives and affairs operate, and look into the fish-bowl from the outside-in, from a distance that would give us a detached perspective to help us analyse our current condition. It only takes what is relatively speaking, a few brief moments in our lives to know exactly what the bigger issues are from this vantage point.

Justice can only be obtained when we know what the ‘bigger’ issues are in order to protect true law and justice, that extends to ‘all’ of us, from being abused. Those bigger issues that threaten all of us, are power and control. We all either learn to behave ourselves by seeing what really counts, or continue on our stupid merry-way into tyranny. In this regard, the so-called youth should stop ‘playing and acting the fool’ and wake-up to what the real threat is to their communites.

None will be able to plead ignorance, which as we will all learn to understand is not an option.

Here then is presented information that will become obvious in its nature, were it not for us being blinded by distractions of every kind and type. This is not to trivialise the tragic events that people everywhere may find themselves in. Nevertheless, they must be seen in a far ‘bigger context’ to be able to ‘grapple’ with them. In this way, a far more effective solution as remedy for what are perceived as injustices can be defended against, morally and above all ‘lawfully’, without the need to escalate and create more animosity towards each other in a personal sense. All of us, if we truly want to understand what is happening, can benefit from reading the following guide, particularly given the seeming direction of hostility in our communities. We’ll be at each others throats but for the truth –

* Share and include links to articles –

Public Service, Common Sense and The Law Part I

Political Charters Create Corporate Countries As Fictions



Whatever Happened to Dixon of Dock Green?

Police Using Tasers to Subdue 11 Year Old Children
If a police officer can’t restrain 11 year old children, should they really be police officers?

Police execute man for ‘talking on cell phone’ in-car evading police

CopBlock – Badges don’t grant extra rights

France to ban website documenting police violence against Muslims

Documenting Police Brutality

Thatcher planned to use army against 1984-1985 British miners’ strike

Mark Duggan’s death: the police still have serious questions to answer
“By all accounts, Mark Duggan was not a very nice man. Although he’d only ever been convicted of a couple of relatively minor offences, he was involved in serious criminality. Gang crime. Hard drugs. Firearms.”

Mark Duggan family reacts with fury to inquest verdict of lawful killing –
Jury decides Duggan was lawfully killed despite concluding he was not holding gun when police shot him

Mark Duggan inquest: Family fury at lawful killing decision

Met police hope personal cameras can restore trust after Mark Duggan killing –
Commissioner admits force has to win confidence of black Londoners – though figures don’t point to trigger-happy culture




Leaked: The Internet Must Go – The Corporate Plan to Take Over the Internet

EU To Ban Heirloom Seeds and Criminalize Unregistered Gardens


Ukrainian Genocide of 1932-1933

Ukraine Famine

Holodomor – Ukrainian Genocide 1932-33 (VIDEO)

Genocide by famine-Ukraine part 1 of 6 (VIDEO)

HOLODOMOR : The famine-genocide of Ukraine, 1932-1933.

Depopulation Through Planned Governmental Starvation of U.S. Citizens

Note. Provides for an excellent test run for emergency preparedness –
FEMA Region 3 Has Been Activated: Emergency Situation Breaking In West Virginia

Agenda 21 Mission Statement: Goal, Depopulation Of The Earth To 500 Million People (Video)

Agenda 21: How Globalist Domination Happens on a Local Level

Agenda 21: How Globalist Domination Happens on a Local Level

When Did Truth Become a Conspiracy Theory?


BBC’s six-year cover-up of secret ‘green propaganda’ training for top executives



NOTE. To understand the bankers lie of economy accurately, it is important to read the contents to the links under the heading ECONOMY in the easy to understand primer –


There are inaccuracies with the video, ‘The international Banking Cartel’, when it comes to explaining how banking works and how to solve the problems created by the bankers lie of economy. It is strongly adviced that the ‘QUICK LINK GUIDE FOR RAPID UNDERSTANDING OF LIBERTY’ is opened and the contents under the title heading TRUE ECONOMY or ECONOMY are read.

The International Banking Cartel (VIDEO)




― Charles Fort


An act of ‘defeatism’, whose hidden power eliminates all opposition to rule by the crown, acheived by means of pretended or unimposing insubordination, knowingly or unknowingly, by the ‘Founding Fathers’, as a mirage of rebellion together with the people’s lack of understanding the true meaning and origins of the United States

A true compass to chart your bearings on setting sail for the seas of life –





American Maritime History – Founding Salts: The Boston Port Bill

Colonial Government

Founding Fathers of the United States

We read, ‘From 1774 to 1789, the Continental Congress served as the government of the 13 American colonies and later the United States.’

First Continental Congress

Continental Congress

First Continental Congress

First Continental Congress convenes

Colonial Continental Congress

Journals of the Coninental Congress – The Articles of Association; October 20, 1774

List of delegates to the Continental Congress
Continental Congress

Secret journals of the acts and proceedings of Congress, from the first meeting thereof to the dissolution of the Confederation (1820)

In Benjamin H. Irvin’s, Clothed in Robes of Sovereignty: The Continental Congress and the People Out (Oxford University Press), we read on page 1, Introduction: To “Stamp the Character of the People, ‘Shortly after adopting the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776, the Continental Congress appointed a committee “to bring in a device for a seal for the United States of America.” As members of Congress understood, every political entity – be it a state or, in this instance, a union of states – needed a seal.’


Definition of association

(often in names) a group of people organized for a joint purpose.
“the National Association of Probation Officers”
synonyms: alliance, consortium, coalition, union, league, guild, syndicate, corporation, federation, confederation, confederacy, conglomerate, cooperative, partnership, amalgamation, merger; body, group, ring, circle, trust, company, organization, affiliation, society, club, band, brotherhood, fraternity, sorority, clique, cartel; rareconsociation, sodality
“the industry has established a trade association”
a stable plant community including a characteristic group of dominant plant species.
“a bog association containing ericaceous plants”
a connection or cooperative link between people or organizations.
“he developed a close association with the university”
synonyms: relationship, relation, interrelation, connection, interconnection, link, bond, tie, attachment, interdependence, union; communication, interchange, contact, affiliation, cooperation; dealings
“they study the association between man and environment”

Definition of association

Definition of association

Articles of association

*Articles Of Association – Investopedia explains ‘Articles Of Association’

Article – etymology


The Charters of Freedom (United States of America), that ‘incorporated’ the United States of America can be traced back to that corporations parent company – The First Continental Congress …


FAQ – Charters of Freedom (What are the Charters of Freedom?)

File:Declaration independence.jpg



It is of interest to note that the land to be transferred in question, is to go to the United States as an entity in its own right. The land to be transferred is not to go to a man, woman or child as separate entities in their own right, but to the United States. Then what is the United States?

A bill to accept a deed of gift or conveyance from the Lincoln Farm Association, a corporation, to the United States of America, of land near the town of Hodgenville, county of Larue, state of Kentucky … (1916)

Then what is the United States? –
Political Charters Create Corporate Countries As Fictions

Congressional or Federal Charters: Overview and Enduring Issues



America’s Founding Fathers

The American Monarchy

‪ALL U.S. Presidents Except For One Are Related To One British King

Royal descent

King John Lackland

King George III
NNDB tracking the entire world

George Washington

Why are so many Presidents related to the Royal Family?

Is ruling in the genes? All presidents bar one are directly descended from a medieval English king

American Presidential Bloodlines

Nearly all US Presidents are Related to the British and French Royal Families



The Dying God


Dying-and-rising god

Search terms –

The Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997

Sourced by:

Year: 1997
Number: 1778



– Aeschylus

Liberty is the condition of duty, the guardian of conscience. It grows as conscience grows. The domains of both grow together. Liberty is safety from all hindrances, even sin. So that Liberty ends by being Free Will.
John Acton

The intuition of free will gives us the truth.
Corliss Lamont




Online Etymology Dictionary

Legal definition of Act



An Act can also be considered to bring about a charter or its continuation. An example of this –

The British East India Company

East India Company

Charter Act of 1793

Charter Act of 1813

The Federal and State Constitutions, Colonial Charters, and Other Organic … (1909)










In the interests of obtaining a better understanding in the affairs of man, a different approach, considered a more accurate approach, has been taken when looking at countries and governments. A continuation of this approach follows –

The United States Congress is a plenipotentiary-granting society for the members of its chartered instrumentalities (United States) –


Definition of grant

Etymology of grant

Definition of plenipotentiary

Etymology of plenipotentiary

Definition of instrumentality

Etymology of instrumentality


Any gathering or assembly of men and women, whether calling themselves a congress, a parliament, an assembly, and so on, all nevertheless, meet together as a group or association to further ‘their common interests’ in forming a society. ‘Their common interests’, is a phrasal term that relates to the members of the society only, who as ‘free-willed’ people, are free to choose to join the society as members, if it is open for them to join.

Those who do not wish to be a part of those ‘common interests’, are quite ‘free’ to reject them.

It is glaringly obvious, that this ‘society’ of men and women conform to the principles through which a corporation is created by charter. A Society of ‘anything’ is then – another synonym for a chartered corporation in line with the explanation given in –

Political Charters Create Corporate Countries As Fictions

The United States Congress as a society, can be said to have then gone on to create the United States as a chartered corporation, not forgetting that the members of that congress, being members of the United States Congress, were in fact congress members of colonial congresses.

Regardless of the private corporate congresses to which the members belonged, countries as fictions are created by political charters.

Finally, it must be noted that these organisations are to be considered as private, because not everyone necessarily would want to join them as members. And in that regard, their affairs would be their private business and therefore, would clearly not extend to non-members.

The excellent work by Veronica Chapman, given on page 41 of ‘Freedom Is More Than Just A 7-Letter Word’, Chapter 8: Societies & Statutes, illustrates the signifance of understanding the nature of societies. The work as a whole is a most insightful and worthwhile read.


Affairs Of A Notable Society (The United States Congress) –
United States Congressional Serial Set

Search Terms for

*state corporation

*charter of the city of

*the charters of



*Category:Political charters

Constitution (see above – *Category:Political charters)

*Charters as municipal constitutions (1973)

Coordinated Legal Technologies –
Secretaries of State

List of national constitutions


He who creates, grants, establishes;
Remains the owner, together with his assigns, of that which is created, granted, established

Legal definition of assigns

The Treaty of Rome – 25 March 1957

Bottom of page two reads –

‘HAVE DECIDED to create a European Economic Community and to this end have
designated as their Plenipotentiaries:’




NOTE. United Nations as a private chartered fictional corporate body is clearly open for other private chartered fictional corporate bodies to become members –





Note. The preamble is significant, in that it shows that members are to be considered those whom have agreed to be members and, of course, membership cannot fall on those who have not. This aligns to the similar wording to be found in the preamble to ‘The United States Constitution’ –

Preamble to The United States Constitution –

‘We the people of the United States, …’



Member States of the United Nations

National Constitutions Are Formed Through Political Charters Creating Constitutional States –
List of national constitutions

Note. The question is, who owns government ? –
Government-owned corporation

European Charter of Local Self-Government




Dating medieval English charters (January 11, 2013)

British borough charters, 1216-1307 (1923)

British borough charters, 1042-1216 (1913)


The federal and state constitutions, colonial charters, and other organic laws of the state, territories, and colonies now or heretofore forming the United States of America (1909)


Note. It must be remembered that when charters talk of freedom, within those very same charters, they may state the obvious. However, as private instruments of those who created them, joining or contracting to them, effectively restricts the freedoms of anyone doing so. Whether this is seen as admirable, is for the individual to decide –

Page 2 of ‘Charters of our freedom’, Chapter 1 The Nature of Freedom, we read from a fragment of the Magna Carta (Charter),

“Know ye that we by this our present Charter No freeman shall be seized…”

What is worth thinking about, is that a freeman is a freeman because he has no restrictions placed on his freewill in conformity with Natural Law, in so far as he does not cause injury to others and their property, and that he avoids reckless behaviour at the risk of causing injury or disruption to the well-being of others.

Once a freeman becomes party to a charter, his freedoms in conformity to freewill bestowed by Natural Law are restricted. It is for those who are party to a charter, to ensure that the restrictions placed on them by a charter do not extend to ‘freemen’.

Charters of our freedom ([n.d.])


The hiding of the charter (1900)

Municipal charters; a discussion of the essentials of a city charter, with forms or models for adoption (1914)

A Model City Charter and Municipal Home Rule (1916)

A model city charter and municipal home rule as prepared by the Committee on municipal program of the National municipal league (1916)

*Model city charter (1964)

The Limitations of the Power of a State under a Reserved Right to Amend or Repeal Charters of Incorporation. (Continued from Page 47) (February 1, 1905)

Power of Municipalities to Amend Their Own Charters (May 1, 1914)

The Bank charter act (1857])



When Was The United States Founded?

The Dongan charter and present charter, together with laws of the state of New York applicable to the city of Albany, and the city laws and ordinances of the city of Albany .. (1896)

The Dongan Charter of the City of New York, 1686 (1686)

Charters of Freedom

The Charters of Freedom – Constitution

When Was The United States Founded?

The charter of the city of New York. Published pursuant to an order of Common Council, passed June 14th, 1819 (1819)

The Greater New York charter : submitted to the Legislature of the state of New York, on February 20, 1897, by the Commission appointed pursuant to chapter 488 of the laws of 1896 (1897])




Congressional or Federal Charters: Overview and Enduring Issues


TREATY OF PARIS (disambiguation)



Observations –

Americans We Are SLAVES To The British Crown. The Paris Peace Treaty of 1783

The Missing Original 13th Amendment – Titles of Nobility and Honor Amendment

Note. In the treaty Prince George the Third is described as the prince elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc., and of the United States –


Paris Peace Treaty 1783

The Paris Peace Treaty of September 30, 1783

Definition of Elector

Elector -etymology


Etymology of “kur”

Definition of elector – etymology

The Treaty of Paris, A.D 1783

Peace of Paris



“Knowledge is Freedom” – James Montgomery




– Harriet Tubman



Let us be clear –


Slavery anywhere is unacceptable, however, it is each individuals freewill prerogative or privilege to ‘choose’ to enslave themselves if they have not been forced into slavery. This generally happens when people are not fully aware of the issues and as a result delude themselves into thinking that they have to do as authority says because of something ‘loosely’ described as the law, legislation, statues, codes, and so on.

It is true that those individuals that ‘choose’ to belong to the jurisdiction of a private fictional corporate country, must do as the authorities of that private fictional corporate country say, and rightly so. The fault that some of the things legislated for, and that maybe unpleasant to any of the individuals of that jurisdiction, has nothing to do whatsoever with government or whomsoever is in government. Nor does the fault lie with the Owners of countries.

The fault lies squarely at our feet, for not taking time to understand our position in relation to each other, which is a position that ‘freewill’ reveals for us to understand.

Government, including public servants of any description, and the Owners of countries would be at fault only if, having understood the position for people with regards to ‘freewill’ in relation to government and country, they would prevent people from leaving their jurisdiction or at the very least make it difficult to leave. Given those circumstances, people could then strictly be described as being in a condition of imposition or slavery.

We are all equal before Nature’s Law of freewill that nature’s Cause or nature’s God has endowed on each and everyone of us. There is no one on this earth, regardless of their assumed status, who is in any way different from anyone else in this regards. Therefore, clearly there can be no slavery unless you choose and insist on being a slave.

Without all the ‘facts’ placed before us, it is very difficult to understand or ‘see’ that we all have allowed ourselves to be deluded into freely choosing to become slaves.

When we insist on being citizens, or say that we come from a certain country, instead of saying that we come from a certain land commonly called for example, Italy, then without realising it, we enslave ourselves to a privately owned fictional entity which has rules for its members and is entitled to change any of its rules at any time, if it so desires.

The reasons that there can be no slavery is recognised by a countries government, when it talks about its ‘jurisdiction’. It is clearly impossible for government or the State, to be ignorant of the ‘facts’ that ‘freewill’ reveals, and therefore it can be seen that government or the State understands what ‘freewill’ means and what its needs are, through Jurisdiction.

An explanation of jurisdiction in relation to ‘public servants’ and those ‘outside of government jurisdiction’, is briefly and clearly presented in the following links –



Once we understand what the issues are, it becomes clear to see that problems arise because people have not truly understood what a country and a countries government in governing it, actually represent.

Understanding the basics of why these entities exist, that is to say their true purpose or reasons for existing, and the only way these entities as countries and their governments can come into existance when they are created, makes it clear to ‘see’ what other purpose they could ultimately exist for, if they stopped being ‘charitable’ in their affairs. When that becomes the case, the only direction that is left for them to take, particularly when they are so closely aligned to central banks, is one that does not take a great deal of imagination – feudalism.


A CALL TO PROTEST Or, ‘Burn the Fucking System to the Ground’

An Ode To Travelers Through Life –

Protest not the personal affairs of others
But the affairs of others in your own personal affairs

Least in your ignorance you bear false witness
Know to keep your affairs your own
So you need not enter the affairs of the Underworld
For passage within its realm is not yours to direct


Although we may mean well, protest does not, and will not ever, achieve liberty or true justice.

The reasons for this can be put simply –

“No one has any business meddling in your personal affairs.”

In like manner people have no business meddling in the affairs of a private fictional corporate country that represents the personal affairs of the Owners of that private fictional corporate country.

If you tire, or do not wish any longer to be a guest in someone’s home, then leave. You are free to do so. However, in no way can you think that you are in a position to ‘protest’ as to how he conducts his affairs in his own home. Simply put, that would be lunacy.

We must therefore be careful when we call to action for people to protest or ‘Burn the Fucking System to the Ground’. It simply is not ours to burn to the ground.

In this sense, government have every right to describe people as protestors, or be hostile to people as protestors when they all remain within government jurisdiction. They clearly represent a threat to something that is not theirs to threaten or protest against.

Once again, if you don’t like the way your host is treating you, then leave. In so doing, if you are prevented from leaving then you are within your rights to defend yourself. There can be no imposition of slavery. All everyone need do, is leave the hosts jurisdiction and organise themselves in the way they want as they always have done and have been capable of doing long before countries or governments existed. It is clear for people to see that they are the ones who do all the work to get something organised and done.

And of course, in getting something done, we must all understand we contract with each other to do so. The law would still exist whether you left governments jurisdiction or not.

Nevertheless, what can be done is, rather than protest in great numbers, why not use your great numbers to support each other in leaving the jurisdiction of government.

It must be clear by now, that the personal affairs of someone else have nothing to do with you. And that being the case, whatever ‘their affairs’ amount to, whether they amount to something said, or whether they amount to ‘rules’ they make, then, if you don’t like what is proposed, leave.

Do not protest just leave, especially if you strongly feel that you are being taken advantage of.

Finally, a very exacting and excellent place to show you how to go about leaving government jurisdiction, is –

Marc Stevens – “Bringing about a Voluntary Society one visitor at a time”


In the next article titled,


what is proposed, is to ‘explore’ whether there is an alternative to passports that all governments recognise as a legal obligation, in knowing that there can be ‘no slavery’ even when it comes to travel.





4-H Promotes Biotech to “Facilitate Youth Programming”

National Security Agency (US government) calls Americans Zombies –

NSA Mocks Apple’s “Zombie” Customers; Asks “Your Target Is Using A BlackBerry? Now What?”

iSpy: How the NSA Accesses Smartphone Data

Apple – 1984

NSA presentation graphics jpegs

NSA Has Full “Back Door” Access To iPhone, BlackBerry And Android Smartphones, Documents Reveal


Alternative for NSA calls people Zombies –


DHS Practices Mowing Down Civilian “Zombies” During Anti-Terror Training Exercise

Ohio Homeland Security Holds Zombie Training Exercise

‘Zombie Apocalypse’ Training Drill Organized By Halo Corp. For Military, Police Set For Oct. 31 In San Diego

Sen. Tom Coburn blasts homeland security spending as wasteful in report citing zombie apocalypse training

NO JOKE! US Gov’t Holding Military Exercise To Defend Against ZOMBIE APOCALYPSE


I’m One of the 22,000 Homeless Kids Living in New York

The Economic and Social Crisis in Spain. “They Want to Make Poverty Normal”

Oral cholera vaccine loaded with GMOs to be tested on babies worldwide

Drug companies accused of holding back complete information on clinical trials


The Vaccine Caused ‘Spanish Flu’ killed 20 million****

Swine Flu Exposé (entire book) by Eleanora I. McBean, Ph.D., N.D. (see Chapter 2)


Vaccines Did Not Save Us – 2 Centuries Of Official Statistics

Secret British MMR Vaccine Files Forced Open By Legal Action



Legislating Tyranny

“Democratic Dictatorship”: The Transition towards Authoritarian Rule in America

The Fascist Origin and Essence of Privatization

French eco tax mobilises new generation of Breton red caps

Encrypted Email and VOIP to Replace Google and Skype






The only explanation that has ever provided the “true reasons” for defaults, and certain economic collapse, can be found at the bottom of the web-page under the title, *MATHEMATICALLY PERFECTED ECONOMY



IMF paper warns of ‘savings tax’ and mass write-offs as West’s debt hits 200-year high

Engineering Evil: IMF paper warns of ‘savings tax’ – EEV: – The policy may essentially be a confiscation of savings

This time is no different – Sovereign default throughout history

A Long and Painful History of Sovereign Debt Default

A Visual History of Financial Crises

Part 2. How Often Have Sovereign Countries Defaulted in the Past?

Note. The only true explanation that has provided accuracy in accounting for so-called inflation in economics, was discovered over 30 years ago.
This explanation for inflation can be heard in combination with a graphical demonstration of its workings, with the opening of the last link at the bottom of the web-page under the title Mathematically Perfected Economy –
Sovereign Defaults Past And Present In One Chart

The U.S. Has REPEATEDLY Defaulted

Business lending slump deepens, as mortgage approvals hit fresh high

French borrowing costs rising at ‘worrying’ rate

Sovereign default probabilities online




An accompanying and indispensable resource:

Australia for Mathematically Perfected Economy





The Philosopher Kings are as ‘Supermen’ amongst men; As Gods amongst mere mortals.

The Ship of State –

The ship of state is a famous and oft-cited metaphor put forth by Plato in book VI of the Republic. It likens the governance of a city-state to the command of a naval vessel – and ultimately argues that the only men fit to be captain of this ship are philosopher kings, benevolent men with absolute power who have access to the Form of the Good.





A Brief Introduction –

This is posted in the interests of providing “solution” for the problems “the system” appears to be imposing on everyone.

The article, Burn the Fucking System to the Ground, appeared in the pages of the informative and challenging website, Popehat.
In order to have a better feel for Popehat’s contributors and readers it is suggested that the ‘about’ webpage link, given below, is read. An extract of this page reads –

“Since a number of Popehat’s authors are attorneys, work in closely related fields, or have strong interests in politics, law is also a relative constant in the site’s focus. Nevertheless, though it may seem to be at times, this is not a “law blog” as such. Ultimately, the subject of Popehat is whatever the author of a given post wishes to discuss, aided by a good community of readers and commenters, whose thoughts and feedback are greatly appreciated.”



The founder of Popehat, Ken White, in the words of Kevin O’Keefe in his article Popehat unmasked: For a good cause, has provided for ‘valuable insight and commentary’ –

“Perhaps I don’t like anonymous bloggers. Perhaps I was envious of what is a dam good title for a law blog. Perhaps I am too defensive.

But no question I ran across the law blog because of it’s valuable insight and commentary running under the tagline “A Group Complaint About Law, Liberty, and Leisure. Ken didn’t hold a punch.”

Kevin O’Keefe’s Real Lawyers Have Blogs


Gratitude has to be given to Popehat for its courage of providing ‘insight and commnentary’ in the spirit of its tagline. This is particularly so, given the general feeling of dissatisfaction people seem to have everywhere, with what is euphemistically termed “the system” or, depending on your justified level of angst, “the Fucking System”.

Be Wary Of The Scribes And Their Attendants Bestowing Acts Of Charity, is by no means meant to be disparaging. It is to be taken to mean that attorneys are ultimately seen to be at the forefront of all the ‘action’, when acting in the best interests of their clients or the State. And therefore, because they have our lives in their hands, just as with anybody else in the forefront of ‘action’ that affects our lives, it must not be of course assumed that attorneys are necessarily in a position of being fully aware of the ‘overall influences’ that affect our personal interests. These men and women and their attendants are to be considered honourable, and are rightly and deservedly confident when it comes to their craft. Nevertheless, do they really have the ‘all encompassing facts’ before them to be able to act in our best interests? The same must especially be said of their ‘attendants’, since by no means do they boast of having specialised in the study of law.

The preceding question provides a means by which we can, taking the article ‘Burn the Fucking System to the Ground’ and in particular its commentaries as ‘indicators’ to help us, examine for ourselves whether attorneys and their attendants are fully ‘aware’ of the ‘all encompassing facts’, when it comes to our personal interests concerning ‘the Fucking System’.

It is for the reader to contemplate whether or not this matters to them in their life, nevertheless, to pose the question and draw forth the issues may enlighten us in understanding so much better influences on our lives when we attempt to conduct our personal affairs more wisely.

In facilitating the examination of the question of whether or not attorneys, and what can be ‘loosely’ termed their attendants, are indeed fully aware of the most important issues concerning our personal interests, our examination of the issues involved in Burn the Fucking System to the Ground, need to be considered in the light of ‘just cause’ or ‘justifiable cause’ to do just that – Burn the Fucking System to the Ground. The why of this, is of course that we must always be seen to be acting justifiably when we call to action the burning of any fucking system to the ground, even when such a call to action is said as a mere sentiment of our personal feelings. After all, if we admittedly have called for the burning of something, even as sentiment of our feelings, are we not to jusify our actions or feelings when called to account.

Freewill is no idle luxury. It is ‘hell’ to maintain but worth the maintenance especially when we seldom get it right.




Comments from the readers of the article and comments from the author of the article and his supporters are to be taken –

from (sixhonest servingmen • Dec 31, 2013 @1:10 pm)

to (sixhonest servingmen • Jan 1, 2014 @2:08 am)

Burn the Fucking System to the Ground

(Note. The article Burn the Fucking System to the Ground is provided in full without active hyperlink connections towards the end of this web-page for educational purposes only, after which the US Tax Treaties follow.)

The exchange of comments made by the readers of the article ‘Burn the Fucking System to the Ground’ have been deliberately limited to a flurry of comments.

What is attempted by ‘sixhonest servingmen’ is to demonstrate that the ‘issues’ a constitution presents, are of no relevance to those who do not wish to involve themselves, as and when they choose, in somebody elses ‘private corporate policies’ or affiars.

This can be seen as an insightful exercise for individuals to determine for themselves the meaning and sense of the comments made, in trying to understand what it is we are looking at, when we take the segment of comments made by the contributory author to Popehat, his supporters, and ‘sixhonest servingmen’ (six), from the date and time marks given.

Finally, narrowing the time-frame for suggested examination has been done to facilitate a clear examination of the issues. However, undeniably there will be other issues that matter to people. It is not intended that they be given an airing here, since the scope of our examination does not extend to them –




Entire Exchange of comments between the author (Clark), his supporters and ‘sixhonest servingmen’ (six), given within a limited time-frame of reference –

from (sixhonest servingmen • Dec 31, 2013 @1:10 pm)

to (sixhonest servingmen • Jan 1, 2014 @2:08 am)



sixhonest servingmen • Dec 31, 2013 @1:10 pm

wakey, wakey.
It ain’t your fucking system to burn to the ground. All you’ve got to do is leave it the fuck alone. In other words mind your own business –



Dave • Dec 31, 2013 @1:36 pm

I’d be perfectly happy to leave the system alone, if it would leave ME the fuck alone.

sixhonest servingmen • Dec 31, 2013 @1:43 pm

Dave, check-out the link, spread the word, and lets make a go of it –


Clark • Dec 31, 2013 @1:44 pm

@sixhonest servingmen

wakey, wakey.
It ain’t your fucking system to burn to the ground.

But in democracy, government is just something we all do together, right?

And I want to burn it to the ground.

Clark • Dec 31, 2013 @1:45 pm


I’d be perfectly happy to leave the system alone, if it would leave ME the fuck alone.


Anyone who wants to form a private commune / police state on their own land can do so – I won’t step in to tell you that your hobby project is wrong because it forbids you from smoking pot, or watching television that uses the F-bomb, or whatever.

…and in return, please keep your police state our of my life.

…but they’re not willing to do so.

sixhonest servingmen • Dec 31, 2013 @1:47 pm

Clark, that ain’t it. Democracy isn’t something we ALL do together. Just check out the link and read whatever appears under the sub-title heading JURISDICTION

Clark • Dec 31, 2013 @1:50 pm

@sixhonest servingmen

Clark, that ain’t it. Democracy isn’t something we ALL do together. Just check out the link and read whatever appears under the sub-title heading JURISDICTION

I’ve read most of this.

…and yet I don’t know what point you’re making.

Can you restate it?

J@m3z Aitch • Dec 31, 2013 @1:59 pm

@Sam Adams,

light the match and the bullshit burns away…

“gay” marriage and the adoption/raising of human children by “gay” families…[…]

non-stop sophist justifications for absolute ungodly, anti-life insanity…[…]

no time to prance around like a pampered sodomite spouting lofty rationalizations while committing crimes against nature

So, you’re not advocating peaceful anarchy, but one in which all the sodomites are prevented from acting out their perversions, or adopting children? That’s going to take a lot of force, isn’t it?

And so Sam embodies the reason so many of us ask, “and what then?” Because if burning the fucking system to the ground results in Sam’s world, I don’t see the gain. I’ve seen systems dominated by moralistic cockroaches, and they’re not better than what we’ve got now. Forget Somalia, Sam should move to Uganda, where homosexuality has just been outlawed…he’d fit in well with those sodomite haters.

It’s fine if he’s talking about what happens within the bounds if his own propert, but he didn’t define it that narrowly. No gay marriage, no gay adoption, etc., were proclaimed in absolute terms.
This is the posssible world you’re proposing we make possible, Clark. Do you support Sam’s no-sodomites allowed position, and the force that would be necessary to make it a reality? Or do you have a plan for preventing that kind of vicious hatred from exerting itself?

Oh, and Sam? Come the burning of the system to the ground, I advise you not to try to implement your anti-sodomite program in my neighborhood. I’m the live and let live type, but if you’re not willing to let live, neither am I.

sixhonest servingmen • Dec 31, 2013 @2:04 pm

Clark, that’s just it. It’s staring you in the face. Read it to understand what matters, and democracy isn’t it. Just keep reading. Seriously

Clark • Dec 31, 2013 @2:09 pm

@sixhonest servingmen

Clark, that’s just it. It’s staring you in the face. Read it to understand what matters, and democracy isn’t it. Just keep reading. Seriously


I’m trying to be polite and give you the benefit of the doubt, but the bottom line is that I don’t know what your thesis is, and your page of links is not helping me.

I can follow most arguments, so if I can’t follow you, I think that means that you’re not expressing your point.

You need to either crisply explain what you’re saying (and telling me “go read a bunch of links”, after I’ve told you that I’ve read most of them doesn’t count) or accept that I’m not going to guess what you’re getting at.

sixhonest servingmen • Dec 31, 2013 @2:18 pm

Clark, what we all do together isn’t democracy it’s jurisdiction, and that means freewill. The question then becomes how does government obtain jurisdiction over us. The answer is they don’t, we simply consent for them to have jurisdiction over us. What matters is to delegitimise their presumed authority with the ‘facts’ and the facts can be understood through reading the few simple articles presented in the link I gave under the title heading JURISDICTION. It is through these brief articles where we go on to learn and understand the territory the government claims to have jurisdiction over. And you can be sure it isn’t where anyone on this earth lives

J@m3z Aitch • Dec 31, 2013 @2:26 pm


Don’t forget the useful quote from M. Aurelius at the top of the page yoy linked to:

You can’t avoid the application of that quote to the claims made in that blog.

John Kindley • Dec 31, 2013 @2:27 pm

“on their own land”

Aye, there’s the rub, and where you and I, and Nock and Rothbard, disagree. The State is defined by lies and theft. Its fundamental lie is authority, and its fundamental theft is land theft. It’s no accident I suggested the State could be reduced to a man’s yard.

Anywhere on this earth people are excluded from the earth, the people excluded should be compensated. This is the formula for peace. A State that claims jurisdiction over the entire territory of the present-day United States has a lot of compensating to do. Better to let whoever wants to come in come in. Then they would only be excluded from those enclaves that pay for their exclusive possession. But even these enclaves are likely to be porous, since every inch of land from which people are excluded must be paid for.

sixhonest servingmen • Dec 31, 2013 @2:35 pm

J@m3z Aitch, you’re quite right. What matters with regards to our lives is the governments position. So, the best thing to do is ask them their position. Failing the unavailibility of having one of their spokesmen provide a direct answer to us, we ought then to find where their position is clearly stated as to where their authority extends when it comes to their presumed ‘claims’ of jurisdiction or authority over us –

(Follow the instructions and open links to find the definition of a country)

J@m3z Aitch • Dec 31, 2013 @3:15 pm

What matters with regards to our lives is the governments position.

Well, that’s one perspective.

Xenocles • Dec 31, 2013 @3:21 pm

You guys are sure being nice to Six. I have no idea what he’s getting at. Simply put, the jurisdiction of a law is wherever its agents both desire to go with a gun and can do so. Getting your head smashed with a baton is a factual proposition, not an opinion. You can face the prospect with equanimity if you choose – which is probably closer to what Marcus Aurelius was getting at – but its occurrence is not a matter of perspective.

Sulaco • Dec 31, 2013 @3:25 pm

“Burn it to the ground”. K, you first.

J@m3z Aitch • Dec 31, 2013 @3:27 pm


I have no idea what he’s getting at, either. But my new year’s resolution is to spend more time toying with people who write their own idiosyncratic political philosophies and promote them through other people’s blogs.

sixhonest servingmen • Dec 31, 2013 @3:46 pm

Here’s something a little more idiosyncratic:

28 USC § 3002 – Definitions
(15) “United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;

The reason for this idiosyncractic perspective given by the Legal Information Institute of Cornell University Law School
is because they probably are well aware of this –

Political Charters Create Corporate Countries As Fictions

Nevertheless, it could be said that Cornell no doubt are themselves being idiosyncratic when it comes to providing the United States Code (USC) that the government publish for all to ‘see’ for themselves. The point is, you need to understand the principles of why the United States is defined in the way it is given in 28 USC § 3002


Anton Sherwood • Dec 31, 2013 @6:10 pm

Six, why show only one of the three meanings given there? Anyway, the definitions in 28 USC §3002 apply, by their own terms, only to 28 USC Chapter 176 (Federal Debt Collection Procedure). A debt owed to any of the three classes of entities named there is (it seems) a debt to USG, so it makes sense to use “United States” in that special sense to simplify the language of Chapter 176.

Clark • Dec 31, 2013 @7:22 pm


You guys are sure being nice to Six.

Yeah…I was trying to be charitable.

I have no idea what he’s getting at.

Me either.

Clark • Dec 31, 2013 @7:32 pm

@sixhonest servingmen

Here’s something a little more idiosyncratic:

28 USC § 3002 – Definitions
(15) “United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;

This sort of thing (Six’s reading of the law / posting about it) pisses me off, because it makes liberty lovers look like the King of the Hill character going on about gold-fringed admiralty flags.

See my post a month about about the kind of idiocy that makes me want to curb-stomp Natural Law protestors.

Six, the closest I come to being a lawyer is reading One L and having taken the LSAT…but even I can tell that the definition you quote applies only to 28 USC Chapter 176.

What does that mean?

Title 28 does not deal with Constitutional issues or address what the government is in some metaphysical sense – it merely lays our procedures by which the goverment courts do their business.

And what does Chapter 176 deal with ? Federal Debt Collection Procedure.

The four subchapters are

You’ve linked into Subchapter A, which defines terms for use in Subchapters A, B, C, and D.

So after about 11 seconds of reading, it’s clear that the bit of 28 USC 176A that you cite (“

(15) ‘United States’ means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States.


is going to be used further down in the chapter in phrases like (making this up as an example) “if a defendent is found to owe court fees to the United States, he will have 30 days to pay by cashier’s check or face interest payments”.

If you’d have us think that you’ve found something interesting, shocking, or powerful here, you are either deeply confused, or – worse yet – you understand the law and you’re playing us for fools, thinking that you can provide a link and not have us check your work and find it lacking.

In either case, it doesn’t seem profitable to engage with you further.

sixhonest servingmen • Jan 1, 2014 @2:08 am

What would be of interest in light of the comment made by Clark at the date and time mark given as ‘Clark • Dec 31, 2013 @7:32 pm’ is, who do I make the check or payment out to, when the procedures for employees of the United States are laid out for them, or if we wish to understand what procedures they have when they do ‘business’ as the United States with regards to court payments or any other payments you care to name.

Needless to say, the payment would not be made-out to a particular man for him to profit by, or representatives of that ‘fictional entity’ for them to profit by, in doing ‘business’ with the United States; but payments would be made for – the benefit of an inanimate ‘fictional’ entity calling itself the United States, for it to do as it wishes with the payments.

The question that then arises is, what is the United States?

Of course, in asking this question it is no business of ours as to what ‘constitutional issues’ the private corporate entity calling its self the United States has, or for that matter what constitutional issues any other private fictional corporate entity holds, when it comes to the conduct of their private affairs or operations.

What is strictly required, is to know to whom or to what do I make the check or payment out to?

Without any doubt, we can arrive at an understanding of who it is, or what it is, we make a payment out to with regards to the United States, if it has a valid and legitimate claim against us, without any need to interfere in its ‘constitutional issues’ or, wanting to know what those constitutional issues are.

We can easily acquire that understanding by reading –

Political Charters Create Corporate Countries As Fictions

For those who rightly consider this to be an opinion, then all that need be done is to ask the government of the United States for a definition of themselves.

Clearly, there is nothing ‘metaphysical’ with regards to our position. It is a reasonable and boringly conscientious position to take.

The answer that the government of the United States has disappointedly given, without the ‘rush of excitement’ that metaphysics instills in some of us, can be found here –

(Follow the instructions and open links to find the definition of a country)

I certainly agree with Clark when he says,

“Title 28 does not deal with Constitutional issues or address what the government is in some metaphysical sense – it merely lays our procedures by which the goverment courts do their business.”,

or better still,

“If you’d have us think that you’ve found something interesting, shocking, or powerful here, you are either deeply confused, or – worse yet – you understand the law and you’re playing us for fools, thinking that you can provide a link and not have us check your work and find it lacking.”

Clark, all I can say is that there certainly is no getting the upper-hand with you!

And, oh yes…you’re right,

“it doesn’t seem profitable to engage with you further.”

Happy New Year and a profitable one at that.

P.s. – who do I make the check out to?




Weather Action Report Sept/Oct 2013 (UN Climate Report – A Disgrace to Science)

Why Heathrow is back in the frame

Bank which employs Tony Blair as adviser paid 126 staff average salary of £2m in 2012


The following has been inspired by a ‘remark’ made by the author of, ‘Burn the Fucking System to the Ground’, given in the comments section –

Burn the Fucking System to the Ground’

The ‘remark’ can be found at the date and time mark given as,

Clark • Dec 31, 2013 @7:32 pm


Ships of State and their members have flags for different purposes:

Lists of flags

Flags of the World

Note. It’s just business, nothing personal
Flag (disambiguation)
Other Uses –
‘Flag state, the state under whose laws a merchant ship is registered or licensed’

National flag


Note. The Ship of State is what is being considered here. In other words, Masthead Flags of State –
The Concept of the Flag State

The Concept of the Flag State pdf (educational purposes only),d.ZG4vb



Dec 23, 2013 By Clark.

Burn the Fucking System to the Ground’


“I’m a good judge” … said by government employee and judge Gisele Pollack who, it seems, sentenced people to jail because of their drug use…while she, herself, was high on drugs.

But, in her defense, “she’s had some severe personal tragedy in her life”.

And that’s why, it seems, she’s being allowed to check herself into rehab instead of being thrown in jail.

…because not a single poor person or non government employee who gets caught using drugs ever “had some severe personal tragedy in her life”.

I’m reminded of something I read earlier today:

We’ve discussed the whole “high court/low court” concept here a few times before — in that those who are powerful play by one set of rules, while the rest of us have to play by a very different set of rules.

The end result seems clear. If you’re super high up in the political chain, you get the high court. Reveal classified info to filmmakers? No worries. Not only will you not be prosecuted or even lose your job, the inspectors will scrub your name from the report and, according to the article, the person in charge of the investigation will “slow roll” the eventual release of the report until you switch jobs.

But if you’re just a worker bee and you leaked the unclassified draft report that names Panetta and Vickers? Well, you get the low court. A new investigation, including aggressive pursuit by the government, and interrogations of staffers to try to find out who leaked the report.

Twenty years ago I was a libertarian. I thought the system could be reformed. I thought that some parts of it “worked”… whatever that means. I thought that the goals were noble, even if not often achieved.

The older I get, the more I see, the more I read, the more clear it becomes to me that the entire game is rigged. The leftists and the rightists each see half of the fraud. The lefties correctly note that a poor kid caught with cocaine goes to jail, while a Bush can write it off as a youthful mistake (they somehow overlook the fact that their man Barrack hasn’t granted clemency to any one of the people doing federal time for the same felonies he committed). The righties note that government subsidized windmills kill protected eagles with impunity while Joe Sixpack would be deep in the crap if he even picked up a dead eagle from the side of the road. The lefties note that no one was prosecuted over the financial meltdown. The righties note that the Obama administration rewrote bankruptcy law on the fly to loot value from GM stockholders and hand it to the unions. The lefties note that Republicans tweak export rules to give big corporations subsidies. Every now and then both sides join together to note that, hey! the government is spying on every one of us…or that, hey! the government stole a bunch of people’s houses and gave them to Pfizer, because a privately owned for-profit corporation is apparently what the Constitution means by “public use”.

What neither side seems to realize is that the system is not reformable. There are multiple classes of people, but it boils down to the connected, and the not connected. Just as in pre-Revolutionary France, there is a very strict class hierarchy, and the very idea that we are equal before the law is a laughable nonsequitr.

Jamal the $5 weed slinger, Shaneekwa the hair braider, and Loudmouth Bob in the 7-11 parking lot are at the bottom of the hierarchy. They can, literally, be killed with impunity … as long as the dash cam isn’t running. And, hell, half the time they can be killed even if the dash cam is running. This isn’t hyperbole, mother-fucker. This is literal. Question me and I’ll throw 400 cites and 20 youtube clips at you.

Next up from Shaneekwa and Loudmouth Bob are us regular peons. We can have our balls squeezed at the airport, our rectums explored at the roadside, our cars searched because the cops got permission from a dog (I owe some Reason intern a drink for that one), our telephones tapped (because terrorism!), our bank accounts investigated (because FinCEN! and no expectation of privacy!). We don’t own the house we live in, not if someone of a higher social class wants it. We don’t own our own financial lives, because the education accreditation / student loan industry / legal triumvirate have declared that we can never escape – even through bankruptcy – our $200,000 debt that a bunch of adults convinced a can’t-tell-his-ass-from-a-hole-in-the-ground 18 year old that (a) he was smart enough to make his own decisions, and (b) college is a time to explore your interests and broaden yourself). And if there’s a “national security emergency” (defined as two idiots with a pressure cooker), then the constitution is suspended, martial law is declared, and people are hauled out of their homes.

Next up from the regular peons are the unionized, disciplined-voting-blocks. Not-much-brighter-than-a-box-of-crayolas teachers who work 180 days a year and get automatic raises. Firefighters who disproportionately retire on disability the very day they sub in for their bosses and get a paper cut.

A step up from the teachers and firefighters are the cops: all the same advantages of nobility of the previous group, but a few more in addition: the de facto power to murder someone as long as not too many cameras are rolling. The de facto power to confiscate cameras in case the murder wasn’t well planned. A right to keep and bear arms that far exceeds that of the serf class: 50 state concealed carry for life, not just just for actual cops, but even for retired cops.

At the same level of privilege as cops, but slightly off to one side is different class of nobility: the judiciary and the prosecutors. Judges and prosecutors can’t execute citizens in an alley, a parking lot, or their own homes (“he had a knife! …and I don’t care what the lying video says.”), but they can sentence people to decades in jail for things that any clear-minded reading of the Constitution and the 9th and 10th amendments make clear are not with in the purview of the government. They have effectively infinite resources. They orchestrate perp walks. They selectively leak information to shame defendants. They buy testimony from other defendants by promising them immunity. By exercising their discretion they make sure that the bad people are prosecuted while the good people (i.e. members of their own clan) are not.

Above the cops, the prosecutors, and the judiciary we have the true ruling class: the cabal of (most) politicians and (some) CEOs, conspiring both against their own competitors and the public at large. If the public is burdened with a $100 million debt to pay off a money losing stadium, that’s a small price to pay if a politician gets reelected (and gets to hobnob with entertainers and sports heroes via free tickets and backstage passes). If new entrants into a market are hindered and the populace ends up overpaying for coffins, or Tesla cars, or wine that can’t be mail ordered, then that’s a small price to pay if a connected CEO can keep his firm profitable without doing any work to help the customer. If the Google founders want to agitate for Green laws that make Joe Sixpack’s daily commute more expensive at the same time that they buy discount avgas for their private flying fuck palaces, then isn’t that their right? They donated to Obama’s campaign after all!

I could keep myself up all night and into tomorrow by listing different groups of royalty and the ways they scam the system.

…except “scam the system” is a misnomer. I am not listing defects in a perfectable system. I am describing the system.

It is corrupt, corrupt, corrupt. From Ted Kennedy who killed a woman and yet is toasted as a “lion of liberalism”, to George Bush who did his share of party drugs (and my share, and your share, and your share…) while young yet let other youngsters rot in jail for the exact same excesses instead of waving his royal wand of pardoning, to thousand of well-paid NSA employees who put the Stasi to shame in their ruthless destruction of our rights, to the Silicon Valley CEOs who buy vacation houses with the money they make forging and selling chains to Fort Meade, to every single bastard at RSA who had a hand in taking the thirty pieces of silver, to the three star generals who routinely screw subordinates and get away with it (even as sergeants are given dishonorable discharges for the same thing), to the MIT cops and Massachusetts prosecutor who drove Aaron Swartz to suicide, to every drug court judge who sends 22 year olds to jail for pot…while high on Quaalude and vodka because she’s got some fucking personal tragedy and no one understands her pain, to every cop who’s anally raped a citizen under color of law, to every other cop who’s intentionally triggered a “drug” dog because the guy looked guilty, to every politician who goes on moral crusades while barebacking prostitutes and money laundering the payments, to every teacher who retired at age 60 on 80% salary, to every cop who has 50 state concealed carry even while the serfs are disarmed, to every politician, judge, or editorial-writer who has ever used the phrase “first amendment zone” non-ironically: this is how the system is designed to work.

The system is not fixable because it is not broken. It is working, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, to give the insiders their royal prerogatives, and to shove the regulations, the laws, and the debt up the asses of everyone else.

Burn it to the ground.

Burn it to the ground.

Burn it to the ground.

Merry Christmas.



United States Income Tax Treaties – A to Z—A-to-Z

Treaties and TIEAs
(Double Taxation Treaties )